2.2 sec in total
40 ms
1.9 sec
273 ms
Visit rudeotter.com now to see the best up-to-date Rudeotter content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rudeotter.com
Articles and tutorials on LEMP stacks, web app development, Linux servers, domain names, and DNS.
Visit rudeotter.comWe analyzed Rudeotter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
rudeotter.com performance score
40 ms
124 ms
30 ms
43 ms
84 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rudeotter.com, 43% (27 requests) were made to Blog.rudeotter.com and 25% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (418 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 76.6 kB (44%)
175.9 kB
99.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Rudeotter.com main page is 175.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 127.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rudeotter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 42.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.3 kB or 33% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (74%)
43
11
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rudeotter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rudeotter.com
40 ms
blog.rudeotter.com
124 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
30 ms
widget.css
43 ms
css
84 ms
style.css
52 ms
css
98 ms
css
104 ms
style.css
83 ms
wpp.css
75 ms
shortcodes.css
75 ms
form-themes.min.css
72 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
81 ms
magnific_popup.css
81 ms
jquery.js
101 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
96 ms
adsbygoogle.js
37 ms
related.css
95 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
96 ms
idle-timer.min.js
96 ms
custom.js
97 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
99 ms
custom.js
176 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
183 ms
waypoints.min.js
182 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
184 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
185 ms
wp-embed.min.js
189 ms
forms-api.min.js
189 ms
piwik.js
288 ms
rudeotter_bw_logo.gif
158 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
166 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
187 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTY3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
196 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSo3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
196 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzI3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
196 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
196 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-ho3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
195 ms
ca-pub-4369416389847129.js
137 ms
zrt_lookup.html
167 ms
show_ads_impl.js
208 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
26 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12b8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
58 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaI8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
59 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
57 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
58 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T88DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
53 ms
UAnF6lSK1JNc1tqTiG8pNALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
58 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAricDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
58 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-k8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
58 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
67 ms
ETmonarch_2.ttf
29 ms
ads
418 ms
osd.js
8 ms
ads
326 ms
m_js_controller.js
20 ms
abg.js
38 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
63 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
19 ms
s
11 ms
x_button_blue2.png
20 ms
favicon
22 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
12 ms
rudeotter.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rudeotter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rudeotter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rudeotter.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rudeotter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: