2.6 sec in total
581 ms
1.8 sec
190 ms
Visit rufont.ru now to see the best up-to-date Ru Font content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rufont.ru
rufont.ru - can become your!
Visit rufont.ruWe analyzed Rufont.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 581 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
rufont.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value2.7 s
85/100
25%
Value5.6 s
53/100
10%
Value3,980 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.9 s
43/100
10%
581 ms
95 ms
8 ms
187 ms
39 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Rufont.ru, 13% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (581 ms) belongs to the original domain Rufont.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 49.2 kB (57%)
87.1 kB
37.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Rufont.ru main page is 87.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 46.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ru Font images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 19.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.7 kB or 42% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rufont.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (71%)
35
10
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ru Font. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rufont.ru
581 ms
style.css
95 ms
show_ads.js
8 ms
iepngfix_tilebg.js
187 ms
ca-pub-8925921048082252.js
39 ms
zrt_lookup.html
40 ms
show_ads_impl.js
159 ms
aci.js
213 ms
hit
276 ms
logo.gif
98 ms
pixel.gif
199 ms
group-4.gif
201 ms
group-2.gif
200 ms
ur-moderator.gif
200 ms
ur-author.gif
201 ms
ur-admin.gif
201 ms
ur-guest.gif
233 ms
group-3.gif
282 ms
ur-anony.gif
281 ms
ur-member.gif
283 ms
ur-registered.gif
282 ms
group-1.gif
283 ms
top.gif
325 ms
ads
240 ms
osd.js
6 ms
94 ms
184 ms
ads
199 ms
hit
134 ms
506 ms
m_js_controller.js
19 ms
abg.js
30 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
26 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
21 ms
s
12 ms
x_button_blue2.png
5 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
3 ms
match
195 ms
rufont.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
rufont.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rufont.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rufont.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rufont.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
rufont.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ru Font. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: