2.2 sec in total
560 ms
1.2 sec
499 ms
Click here to check amazing Run Repeat content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about runrepeat.com
We've dissected more than 600+ shoes to give you the most in-depth reviews. We buy all shoes with our own money, and every shoe is wear and lab-tested extensively.
Visit runrepeat.comWe analyzed Runrepeat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 560 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
runrepeat.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value800 ms
36/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
560 ms
14 ms
46 ms
45 ms
48 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Runrepeat.com, 71% (69 requests) were made to 1bhjxz11za22amn7v3mn71w1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com and 14% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (560 ms) belongs to the original domain Runrepeat.com.
Page size can be reduced by 598.9 kB (44%)
1.4 MB
773.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Runrepeat.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 652.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Run Repeat images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 257.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 257.2 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 230.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Runrepeat.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 230.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (24%)
79
60
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Run Repeat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
runrepeat.com
560 ms
screen.css
14 ms
css
46 ms
css
45 ms
css
48 ms
style.css
11 ms
animation.css
13 ms
runrepeat.css
13 ms
style_custom.css
19 ms
jquery.js
38 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
16 ms
header.js
15 ms
api.min.js
37 ms
2856670483.js
117 ms
front.js
34 ms
bootstrap.min.js
35 ms
main.js
33 ms
footer.js
32 ms
wp-embed.min.js
33 ms
analytics.js
110 ms
runrepeat-logo.png
108 ms
runrepeat-logo-small.png
31 ms
Layer-26.jpg
41 ms
new-york-times.png
31 ms
wall-street-journal.png
31 ms
the-guardian.png
40 ms
washington-post.png
37 ms
nike-lunaracer-1.jpg
44 ms
vs.png
41 ms
adidas-climacool-modulate-6.jpg
41 ms
adidas.png
42 ms
altra.png
45 ms
asics.png
46 ms
brooks.png
45 ms
dynafit.png
48 ms
ecco.png
46 ms
hagloefs.png
50 ms
helly-hansen.png
48 ms
hoka-one-one.png
50 ms
icebug.png
54 ms
inov-8.png
53 ms
karhu.png
55 ms
la-sportiva.png
54 ms
merrell.png
53 ms
mizuno.png
56 ms
montrail.png
56 ms
new-balance.png
59 ms
newton.png
59 ms
nike.png
60 ms
on.png
58 ms
pearl-izumi.png
62 ms
puma.png
60 ms
reebok.png
110 ms
salming.png
109 ms
salomon.png
109 ms
saucony.png
110 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
113 ms
Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
125 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
128 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
128 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
128 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
127 ms
t6Nd4cfPRhZP44Q5QAjcC50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
129 ms
bmC0pGMXrhphrZJmniIZpZ0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
125 ms
OLffGBTaF0XFOW1gnuHF0Z0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
130 ms
W4wDsBUluyw0tK3tykhXEfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
129 ms
7m8l7TlFO-S3VkhHuR0at50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
131 ms
12mE4jfMSBTmg-81EiS-YS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
130 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
129 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
130 ms
runrepeat.woff
95 ms
scarpa.png
94 ms
scott.png
97 ms
skechers.png
88 ms
spira.png
87 ms
the-north-face.png
85 ms
topo-athletic.png
84 ms
under-armour.png
85 ms
vibram-fivefingers.png
84 ms
vivobarefoot.png
86 ms
zoot.png
86 ms
the-new-york-times.png
84 ms
the-guardian.png
85 ms
wall-street-journal.png
84 ms
the-washington-post.png
85 ms
runners-world.png
84 ms
MSN.png
82 ms
mens-health.png
82 ms
fox_news.png
78 ms
running%20times.png
77 ms
6df451f7-1c24-46cc-a9a4-82c10c0501d3.js
52 ms
collect
63 ms
collect
119 ms
254010
16 ms
254007
20 ms
webfont.js
57 ms
240c3fdf4a3f1450020599-best-running-shoes-gear-patrol-lead-fullxx.jpg
54 ms
runrepeat.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
runrepeat.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
runrepeat.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Runrepeat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Runrepeat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
runrepeat.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Run Repeat. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: