4.3 sec in total
1 sec
3 sec
280 ms
Click here to check amazing Ruthduffy content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ruthduffy.com
Visit ruthduffy.comWe analyzed Ruthduffy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ruthduffy.com performance score
1006 ms
200 ms
210 ms
197 ms
203 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Ruthduffy.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ruthduffy.com.
Page size can be reduced by 519.1 kB (52%)
1.0 MB
481.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Ruthduffy.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 563.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.2 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ruthduffy images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 395.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 395.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ruthduffy.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 87.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (63%)
67
25
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ruthduffy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ruthduffy.com
1006 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
200 ms
grid-12.css
210 ms
gantry.css
197 ms
wordpress.css
203 ms
wordpress.css
154 ms
demo-styles.css
156 ms
style3.css
279 ms
template.css
276 ms
wp.css
315 ms
typography.css
320 ms
backgrounds.css
336 ms
fusionmenu.css
336 ms
splitmenu.css
390 ms
style.css
394 ms
rokbox-style.css
438 ms
rokstories.css
446 ms
roknewspager.css
472 ms
mootools.js
457 ms
gantry-buildspans.js
871 ms
gantry-inputs.js
873 ms
fusion.js
876 ms
rokbox.js
880 ms
rokstories.js
868 ms
roknewspager.js
871 ms
roktabs.js
1008 ms
jquery-1.2.6.min.js
1012 ms
jquery.jqDock.min.js
1006 ms
rokbox-config.js
1003 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1004 ms
analytics.js
71 ms
collect
36 ms
main-bg-texture.jpg
219 ms
main-bg-overlay.png
219 ms
surround-texture.png
217 ms
surround-l.png
218 ms
surround-r.png
215 ms
header-bg.jpg
308 ms
header-bg2.png
881 ms
header-graphic.png
253 ms
logo.png
262 ms
navigation-bg.jpg
286 ms
section-shadow-top.png
284 ms
section-shadow-bottom.png
382 ms
drop-bg-1.png
327 ms
dropmenu-itembg.png
400 ms
sidemenu-icon.png
347 ms
section-overlay.png
423 ms
module-header-flag-l.png
506 ms
module-header-flag-r.png
472 ms
showcase1.jpg
550 ms
showcase-image.png
532 ms
readon-l.png
490 ms
readon-r.png
589 ms
showcase2.jpg
621 ms
showcase4.jpg
674 ms
list-arrow.png
650 ms
module-title-m.png
699 ms
module-title-l.png
652 ms
module-title-r.png
741 ms
module-title-icon.png
715 ms
fp-mb1.jpg
822 ms
articleinfo-m.png
797 ms
articleinfo-l.png
812 ms
articleinfo-r.png
903 ms
sidemenu-itembg.png
817 ms
confidential.png
933 ms
footer-bg.jpg
681 ms
module-title1-bg.png
746 ms
ruthduffy.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ruthduffy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ruthduffy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ruthduffy.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ruthduffy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: