Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

rvcamp.org

露營窩 - 營地資料庫 (已關站)

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

212 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

92 ms

rvcamp.org screenshot

About Website

Visit rvcamp.org now to see the best up-to-date Rvcamp content for Taiwan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rvcamp.org

營地資料庫

Visit rvcamp.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Rvcamp.org page load time and found that the first response time was 212 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rvcamp.org performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.057

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rvcamp.org

212 ms

autoptimize_4a375c0d1be10ebda3494b340a76f770.css

261 ms

autoptimize_cb4a2a4eb9abb4122a03e4d4427e0d84.css

131 ms

jquery.js

196 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

131 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Rvcamp.org, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (1 request) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rvcamp.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 124.4 kB (62%)

Content Size

200.0 kB

After Optimization

75.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Rvcamp.org main page is 200.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 191.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 8.8 kB
  • After minification 8.8 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 60% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 119.1 kB

  • Original 191.2 kB
  • After minification 189.1 kB
  • After compression 72.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 119.1 kB or 62% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (53%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rvcamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rvcamp.org accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rvcamp.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rvcamp.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rvcamp.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Chinese language. Our system also found out that Rvcamp.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rvcamp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: