3.8 sec in total
212 ms
2.8 sec
801 ms
Visit rvchickadee.com now to see the best up-to-date RV Chickadee content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rvchickadee.com
The highlights, goofs, and minimalist adventures of a solo chick who chose to live full-time in an RV.
Visit rvchickadee.comWe analyzed Rvchickadee.com page load time and found that the first response time was 212 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
rvchickadee.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value3.7 s
85/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value5.6 s
69/100
10%
212 ms
555 ms
167 ms
147 ms
259 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rvchickadee.com, 31% (17 requests) were made to Rvchickadee.files.wordpress.com and 17% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Rvchickadee.files.wordpress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 95.2 kB (7%)
1.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Rvchickadee.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RV Chickadee images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 340 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rvchickadee.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (43%)
42
24
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RV Chickadee. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rvchickadee.com
212 ms
rvchickadee.wordpress.com
555 ms
webfont.js
167 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
147 ms
259 ms
style.css
269 ms
css
264 ms
235 ms
154 ms
240 ms
gprofiles.js
259 ms
wpgroho.js
233 ms
230 ms
258 ms
w.js
266 ms
bilmur.min.js
22 ms
css
258 ms
global-print.css
2 ms
cropped-img_484511.jpg
442 ms
0dfd7ad30f253c7fc5777c1594cdbfc6
528 ms
img_2605.jpeg
738 ms
img_9221.jpeg
475 ms
dsc02521.jpeg
467 ms
img_5802.jpeg
567 ms
img_0797.jpeg
814 ms
img_1806.jpg
728 ms
img_8340.jpg
633 ms
img_6495.jpg
639 ms
hood-megan-fox.jpg
668 ms
img_6342.jpg
780 ms
img_3779.jpg
912 ms
img_3063.jpg
887 ms
img_3578.jpg
1066 ms
emotional-fingers-2.jpg
794 ms
img_2488.jpg
1516 ms
ca-banner-300x250-share.jpg
936 ms
3XFtErwl05Ad_vSCF6Fq7xX2Qtzc.ttf
359 ms
OZpbg_xvsDZQL_LKIF7q4jP_eE3vcKnd.ttf
408 ms
OZpEg_xvsDZQL_LKIF7q4jP3w2j_.ttf
445 ms
3XFzErwl05Ad_vSCF6Fq7xX2R-zb_Pw.ttf
444 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
256 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcQ7z.ttf
446 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcDhrE.ttf
442 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3CstcDhrE.ttf
445 ms
P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY-ERCrNfQM.ttf
440 ms
P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY9jQyrNfQM.ttf
446 ms
g.gif
327 ms
1f618.svg
214 ms
hovercard.min.css
213 ms
services.min.css
254 ms
g.gif
278 ms
g.gif
279 ms
actionbar.css
63 ms
actionbar.js
63 ms
rvchickadee.com accessibility score
rvchickadee.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
rvchickadee.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rvchickadee.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rvchickadee.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rvchickadee.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RV Chickadee. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: