19.8 sec in total
6.1 sec
12.4 sec
1.2 sec
Visit blog.screener.in now to see the best up-to-date Blog Screener content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about blog.screener.in
Updates about new features on Screener.in
Visit blog.screener.inWe analyzed Blog.screener.in page load time and found that the first response time was 6.1 sec and then it took 13.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
blog.screener.in performance score
6109 ms
643 ms
655 ms
29 ms
885 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Blog.screener.in, 22% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Screenerblog.disqus.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Blog.screener.in.
Page size can be reduced by 296.1 kB (48%)
615.2 kB
319.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Blog.screener.in main page is 615.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 255.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Blog Screener needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.0 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 82.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 82.7 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 155.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blog.screener.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 155.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (44%)
27
15
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blog Screener. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
blog.screener.in
6109 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
643 ms
twentyfifteen.css
655 ms
css
29 ms
genericons.css
885 ms
style.css
529 ms
jetpack.css
672 ms
jquery.js
1745 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1038 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
1403 ms
functions.js
1162 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
54 ms
count.js
4576 ms
screener-devices.jpg
1374 ms
export.png
1073 ms
columns.gif
4525 ms
consolidated.png
1221 ms
notes.png
512 ms
add-note.png
1010 ms
section-note.png
1965 ms
quick.gif
2187 ms
custom-ratio.png
2203 ms
variables.png
3190 ms
saving-screen.png
2853 ms
Screenshot-from-2012-07-31-112129.png
2978 ms
fVu1p3782bqS2z-CaJvp9r3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff
34 ms
lJAvZoKA5NttpPc9yc6lPSdbhAemgRrz6naF4wAklHw.woff
56 ms
PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ1-Y5mlVXtdNkpsMpKkrDXP4.woff
65 ms
erE3KsIWUumgD1j_Ca-V-7O3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
65 ms
HQXBIwLHsOJCNEQeX9kNz-Y5mlVXtdNkpsMpKkrDXP4.woff
81 ms
Wreg0Be4tcFGM2t6VWytvEIs04IdwfM8211RGOj6sr8.woff
82 ms
Genericons.svg
3326 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=
2 ms
BjAYBlHtW3CJxDcjzrnZCKfTCPadK0KLfdEfFtGWCYw.woff
81 ms
AIed271kqQlcIRSOnQH0yRLE7eCesZRIBkkq27EgTqg.woff
63 ms
count.js
53 ms
count-data.js
47 ms
blog.screener.in SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blog.screener.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Blog.screener.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
blog.screener.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Blog Screener. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: