Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

explore.securityscorecard.com

Security Ratings & Cybersecurity Risk Management | SecurityScorecard

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

184 ms

Resources Loaded

696 ms

Page Rendered

4.6 sec

explore.securityscorecard.com screenshot

About Website

Visit explore.securityscorecard.com now to see the best up-to-date Explore Security Scorecard content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about explore.securityscorecard.com

Discover and solve cybersecurity, compliance and risk management challenges. Instantly rate and understand any company's security risk with SecurityScorecard.

Visit explore.securityscorecard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Explore.securityscorecard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 184 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

explore.securityscorecard.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value26,460 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value38.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

explore.securityscorecard.com

184 ms

securityscorecard.com

233 ms

gtm.js

77 ms

main.css

23 ms

4f6ca7fced130fc0.js

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Explore.securityscorecard.com, 53% (8 requests) were made to Securityscorecard.com and 13% (2 requests) were made to Consent.cookiebot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (236 ms) relates to the external source S3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 125.8 kB (33%)

Content Size

380.2 kB

After Optimization

254.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Explore.securityscorecard.com main page is 380.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 176.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 125.8 kB

  • Original 171.1 kB
  • After minification 169.1 kB
  • After compression 45.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.8 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 176.3 kB
  • After minification 176.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Explore Security Scorecard images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 32.0 kB
  • After minification 32.0 kB
  • After compression 32.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Explore.securityscorecard.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (54%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Explore Security Scorecard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

explore.securityscorecard.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

explore.securityscorecard.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

explore.securityscorecard.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Explore.securityscorecard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Explore.securityscorecard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Explore Security Scorecard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: