Tools & Wizards About Us
saferpak.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

saferpak.com

SaferPak - The Food Packaging Safety & Business Improvement Portal - SaferPak.com

Page Load Speed

986 ms in total

First Response

128 ms

Resources Loaded

525 ms

Page Rendered

333 ms

saferpak.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to saferpak.com homepage info - get ready to check Safer Pak best content right away, or after learning these important things about saferpak.com

Resources include: The BRC/IoP Global Standard - Food Packaging, HACCP, ISO22000, Business Improvement Tools and Techniques, Quality Vacancies and the Saferpak Discussion Forums

Visit saferpak.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Saferpak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 128 ms and then it took 858 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

saferpak.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

51/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value21,450 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

saferpak.com

128 ms

style4.css

45 ms

bottomlinks.css

56 ms

quicklinks.css

55 ms

pviimenudiv.css

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Saferpak.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (232 ms) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 50.8 kB (36%)

Content Size

141.3 kB

After Optimization

90.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Saferpak.com main page is 141.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 74.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 50.5 kB

  • Original 64.8 kB
  • After minification 52.3 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.5 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 74.0 kB
  • After minification 74.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Safer Pak images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 376 B

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.6 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Saferpak.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 376 B or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (53%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Safer Pak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

saferpak.com

saferpak.com

128 ms

style4.css

style4.css

45 ms

bottomlinks.css

bottomlinks.css

56 ms

quicklinks.css

quicklinks.css

55 ms

pviimenudiv.css

pviimenudiv.css

56 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

42 ms

butt1.gif

butt1.gif

166 ms

butt3.gif

butt3.gif

166 ms

butt4.gif

butt4.gif

168 ms

butt5.gif

butt5.gif

168 ms

butt6.gif

butt6.gif

167 ms

butt7.gif

butt7.gif

168 ms

butt10.gif

butt10.gif

170 ms

butt8.gif

butt8.gif

169 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

232 ms

Logo_25wht.gif

Logo_25wht.gif

76 ms

background3.gif

background3.gif

49 ms

SignMeUp.gif

SignMeUp.gif

46 ms

tile_back.gif

tile_back.gif

47 ms

banner.gif

banner.gif

49 ms

tile_sub.gif

tile_sub.gif

45 ms

transparent.gif

transparent.gif

45 ms

tp.jpg

tp.jpg

174 ms

star_pip3.gif

star_pip3.gif

167 ms

booklet_home.jpg

booklet_home.jpg

169 ms

brccover.jpg

brccover.jpg

167 ms

supplier_dir.gif

supplier_dir.gif

169 ms

haccp.gif

haccp.gif

168 ms

world.gif

world.gif

169 ms

forum.gif

forum.gif

169 ms

hand.gif

hand.gif

171 ms

tools.gif

tools.gif

171 ms

question.gif

question.gif

170 ms

Accessibility Review

saferpak.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

saferpak.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

saferpak.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Saferpak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Saferpak.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

saferpak.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Safer Pak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: