Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

santerra.net

Santerra

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

347 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

137 ms

santerra.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to santerra.net homepage info - get ready to check Santerra best content right away, or after learning these important things about santerra.net

Visit santerra.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Santerra.net page load time and found that the first response time was 347 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

santerra.net performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.santerra.net

347 ms

Frontend.css

201 ms

Frontend.js

403 ms

logo.jpg

243 ms

topMenuBg.jpg

215 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Santerra.net, 13% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (676 ms) belongs to the original domain Santerra.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 7.9 kB (12%)

Content Size

65.8 kB

After Optimization

57.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Santerra.net main page is 65.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 38.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 9.8 kB
  • After minification 6.5 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.2 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 366 B

  • Original 38.9 kB
  • After minification 38.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Santerra images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Santerra. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

santerra.net accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

santerra.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

santerra.net SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Santerra.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Santerra.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Santerra. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: