3.7 sec in total
314 ms
3.2 sec
226 ms
Visit sarmreviews.com now to see the best up-to-date Sarmreviews content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sarmreviews.com
Upset about the recent ban of prohormones? Check out these SARMs and real user reviews on our site. These are the next big thing to building muscle!
Visit sarmreviews.comWe analyzed Sarmreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 314 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
sarmreviews.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value4.5 s
36/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value690 ms
43/100
30%
Value0.345
32/100
15%
Value5.6 s
69/100
10%
314 ms
24 ms
65 ms
137 ms
131 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Sarmreviews.com, 14% (8 requests) were made to App.videoleadbox.net and 12% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (539 ms) belongs to the original domain Sarmreviews.com.
Page size can be reduced by 365.9 kB (52%)
701.0 kB
335.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Sarmreviews.com main page is 701.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 261.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sarmreviews needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.8 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 116.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 116.6 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 164.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sarmreviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 164.7 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (63%)
48
18
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sarmreviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sarmreviews.com
314 ms
css
24 ms
9b33245a1e534bc11a8e245944f4aeb0.css
65 ms
bbpress.css
137 ms
form_style.css
131 ms
rating.css
130 ms
colorbox.css
131 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.css
134 ms
style.css
131 ms
bootstrap.min.css
192 ms
font-awesome.min.css
195 ms
style.css
406 ms
addtoany.min.css
198 ms
jquery.js
304 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
200 ms
q2w3-fixed-widget.min.js
254 ms
jquery.rating.pack.js
257 ms
custom.js
259 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
262 ms
cntctfrm.js
317 ms
getboxes.js
48 ms
editor.js
318 ms
tagdiv_theme.js
539 ms
wp-embed.min.js
323 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
298 ms
analytics.js
54 ms
s1-banner.jpg
224 ms
UltimateGuidetoSARMs-238x178.jpg
221 ms
ostashred-featured-238x178.jpg
220 ms
ostabol-featured-238x178.png
188 ms
SUPLGD-2-238x178.jpg
220 ms
Super-Andarine-featured-238x178.png
224 ms
GW-1516-featured-238x178.png
226 ms
enobosarm-the-new-sarm-for-muscle-growth-and-muscle-wasting-treatment-238x178.jpg
223 ms
endurashed-the-best-sarm-to-get-you-shredded-238x178.jpg
223 ms
page.js
145 ms
front_end.js
145 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
142 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
143 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
143 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
142 ms
newsmag.svg
181 ms
newsmag.woff
182 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsFzqCfRpIA3W6ypxnPISCPA.woff
143 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nNeiznanRB67rGZDYkMvKPc.woff
142 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nCSLrGe-fkSRw2DeVgOoWcQ.woff
142 ms
collect
155 ms
player_api
104 ms
front_end.css
60 ms
getboxes.php
48 ms
LGD-4033-SARMS.png
78 ms
front_end_libs.js
32 ms
close_button.png
31 ms
close_button.png
30 ms
arrow%20(2).png
31 ms
www-widgetapi.js
110 ms
css
92 ms
sarmreviews.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sarmreviews.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
sarmreviews.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sarmreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sarmreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sarmreviews.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sarmreviews. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: