5.5 sec in total
597 ms
4.6 sec
360 ms
Welcome to satfoot.com homepage info - get ready to check Satfoot best content for Algeria right away, or after learning these important things about satfoot.com
See related links to what you are looking for.
Visit satfoot.comWe analyzed Satfoot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 597 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
satfoot.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value4.2 s
45/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value860 ms
33/100
30%
Value0.084
93/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
597 ms
62 ms
76 ms
168 ms
339 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Satfoot.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Btfscores.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Reddit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 850.7 kB (54%)
1.6 MB
726.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Satfoot.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 802.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 274.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 274.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Satfoot images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 536.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 536.1 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Satfoot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (58%)
76
32
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Satfoot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
satfoot.com
597 ms
css
62 ms
css
76 ms
style.css
168 ms
overlib.js
339 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
7 ms
adsbygoogle.js
21 ms
widget-side.min.js
242 ms
addthis_widget.js
11 ms
css
34 ms
728X90.jpg
1645 ms
header.jpg
93 ms
logosatfoot.png
197 ms
daily_tv.gif
92 ms
europe.gif
197 ms
La_Liga.gif
196 ms
Premier_League.gif
197 ms
Bundesliga.gif
197 ms
Serie_A.gif
197 ms
Ligue_1.gif
254 ms
Primeira_Liga.gif
254 ms
UEFA.gif
334 ms
champions-league.gif
254 ms
Europa_League.gif
256 ms
es.gif
255 ms
it.gif
338 ms
fr.gif
339 ms
england.gif
338 ms
de.gif
342 ms
pt.gif
340 ms
analytics.js
12 ms
js15.js
5 ms
0.php
12 ms
counter.js
12 ms
collect
33 ms
t.php
61 ms
ca-pub-8245768821596112.js
107 ms
zrt_lookup.html
54 ms
show_ads_impl.js
102 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
40 ms
ads
223 ms
osd.js
11 ms
ads
289 ms
ads
170 ms
ads
315 ms
ads
252 ms
abg.js
33 ms
12852221539176391029
16 ms
s
10 ms
m_js_controller.js
21 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
67 ms
x_button_blue2.png
57 ms
9468670812623961558
64 ms
13710094253662990065
43 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
8 ms
activeview
16 ms
activeview
19 ms
dark-floating.css
25 ms
300lo.json
68 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
18 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
52 ms
ui
69 ms
logo.png
35 ms
jquery.iframe-auto-height.js
122 ms
layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js
8 ms
fql
53 ms
count.json
26 ms
info.json
2156 ms
shares.json
44 ms
jquery.browser.js
100 ms
pixel
18 ms
soccer-sidebar.php
106 ms
widget-side.min.css
101 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
4 ms
jquery.iframe-auto-window.js
191 ms
widget-side-page.min.js
193 ms
flags17.png
486 ms
icons-small.png
97 ms
collect
13 ms
satfoot.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
satfoot.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
satfoot.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Satfoot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Satfoot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
satfoot.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Satfoot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: