2.1 sec in total
85 ms
1.4 sec
582 ms
Visit scentt.com now to see the best up-to-date Scent T content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about scentt.com
ScentSational Technologies leads the industry in developing, patenting and licensing scented product and packaging technologies for food, beverage, pharmaceutical, personal care and consumer products ...
Visit scentt.comWe analyzed Scentt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 85 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
scentt.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
48/100
10%
Value10.2 s
0/100
25%
Value11.3 s
5/100
10%
Value3,590 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.329
35/100
15%
Value18.4 s
3/100
10%
85 ms
18 ms
35 ms
41 ms
42 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Scentt.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (492 ms) relates to the external source Iptrack.io.
Page size can be reduced by 402.1 kB (21%)
1.9 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Scentt.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Scent T images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 311.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 311.6 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scentt.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 79 (84%)
94
15
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scent T. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
scentt.com
85 ms
style.min.css
18 ms
styles.css
35 ms
icomoon-the7-font.min.css
41 ms
Defaults.css
42 ms
js_composer.min.css
68 ms
css
67 ms
main.min.css
46 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.css
41 ms
wpbakery.min.css
106 ms
post-type.min.css
99 ms
css-vars.css
98 ms
custom.css
88 ms
media.css
102 ms
mega-menu.css
114 ms
the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css
112 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
108 ms
style.css
107 ms
style.min.css
108 ms
highlight-box.min.css
117 ms
jquery.min.js
115 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
111 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
113 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
142 ms
highlight-box.min.js
142 ms
lo.js
103 ms
js
109 ms
js
196 ms
rbtools.min.js
194 ms
rs6.min.js
139 ms
20236789.js
192 ms
css
95 ms
style.min.css
192 ms
swiper.min.css
162 ms
all.css
309 ms
background-style.min.css
190 ms
animate.min.css
190 ms
rs6.css
190 ms
main.min.js
249 ms
index.js
302 ms
index.js
303 ms
rbtools.min.js
250 ms
rs6.min.js
249 ms
api.js
108 ms
legacy.min.js
303 ms
jquery-mousewheel.min.js
300 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.js
280 ms
post-type.min.js
272 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
275 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
274 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
259 ms
index.js
231 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
222 ms
three.min.js
219 ms
swiper.min.js
218 ms
anime.min.js
215 ms
webfontloader.js
213 ms
iconify.min.js
216 ms
transitionSlider.min.js
211 ms
transitionSlider.webgl.min.js
214 ms
embed.js
209 ms
jquery-appear.min.js
286 ms
ultimate_bg.min.js
208 ms
custom.min.js
206 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
209 ms
gtm.js
167 ms
wiv.js
492 ms
ScentSational-Logo-Green-Blue-plus-R.png
155 ms
the7-chevron-down.svg
158 ms
brandcolors-scentcerts-v2.jpg
156 ms
brandcolors-scentcerts-split-v2.jpg
157 ms
lo.legacy.js
141 ms
dummy.png
207 ms
flavour-img1.jpg
204 ms
js
130 ms
analytics.js
125 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
164 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
195 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
330 ms
icomoon-the7-font.ttf
94 ms
collect
33 ms
collect
254 ms
leadflows.js
379 ms
collectedforms.js
380 ms
20236789.js
381 ms
banner.js
283 ms
recaptcha__en.js
223 ms
325dce92
174 ms
webcomponents-lite.min.js
222 ms
ga-audiences
133 ms
main.js
47 ms
who.ashx
475 ms
anchor
115 ms
styles__ltr.css
14 ms
recaptcha__en.js
30 ms
KkWFeSURekXGycdprVC-UY6ED-ZF5ll2JCMiHhJE2Rk.js
130 ms
webworker.js
147 ms
logo_48.png
116 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
10 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
10 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
25 ms
recaptcha__en.js
10 ms
scentt.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
scentt.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
scentt.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scentt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scentt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
scentt.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Scent T. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: