4.8 sec in total
113 ms
4.2 sec
450 ms
Welcome to screencheck.com homepage info - get ready to check Screen Check best content right away, or after learning these important things about screencheck.com
ScreenCheck creates ID solutions using full-featured Card Software to design, manage and produce digital or printed ID cards.
Visit screencheck.comWe analyzed Screencheck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
screencheck.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value13.9 s
0/100
25%
Value29.9 s
0/100
10%
Value24,640 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value34.9 s
0/100
10%
113 ms
173 ms
588 ms
68 ms
118 ms
Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (96 requests) were addressed to the original Screencheck.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (871 ms) belongs to the original domain Screencheck.com.
Page size can be reduced by 188.3 kB (23%)
809.1 kB
620.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Screencheck.com main page is 809.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 338.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 151.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 151.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screen Check images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 239 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screencheck.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (71%)
85
25
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screen Check. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 58 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
screencheck.com
113 ms
173 ms
autoptimize_2c261f929e617133cdaf6105ab43809d.css
588 ms
css
68 ms
autoptimize_single_d2e6cb61805959d8937058dd6c6f02eb.css
118 ms
autoptimize_single_67e2dd74e008dc2a728caa225b451c19.css
361 ms
fingerprint.min.js
369 ms
jquery.min.js
462 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
401 ms
autoptimize_single_9ba386c42370e3a8edbc845baba13f0c.js
193 ms
ytprefs.min.js
275 ms
um-gdpr.min.js
356 ms
n2.min.js
436 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
528 ms
ss-simple.min.js
450 ms
smartslider-backgroundanimation.min.js
482 ms
w-arrow-image.min.js
518 ms
ss-block.min.js
536 ms
lazysizes.min.js
545 ms
autoptimize_single_490c29d6776fc430c23403fd845b34b0.js
693 ms
autoptimize_single_3f3fc23f477a3849aa5677c585b2a2b4.js
836 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
837 ms
theme.min.js
838 ms
drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js
839 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
841 ms
ow-lightbox.min.js
841 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
846 ms
ow-slider.min.js
848 ms
scroll-effect.min.js
849 ms
scroll-top.min.js
849 ms
select.min.js
851 ms
autoptimize_single_a1ade95e21102c15d71ee475ac3818f6.js
852 ms
api.js
63 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
852 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
853 ms
autoptimize_single_6a0e8318d42803736d2fafcc12238026.js
855 ms
select2.full.min.js
856 ms
underscore.min.js
871 ms
wp-util.min.js
871 ms
um-crop.min.js
869 ms
um-modal.min.js
776 ms
um-jquery-form.min.js
694 ms
autoptimize_single_d167edd3d4b62508e4e634e457d2b360.js
619 ms
autoptimize_single_8c97cee89dd2d40b4226605d454b5cf6.js
652 ms
autoptimize_single_fac350e91c069e07984a4c09511f4718.js
648 ms
autoptimize_single_2e9281dee2541d5c2f2686963501499d.js
662 ms
hooks.min.js
632 ms
i18n.min.js
593 ms
um-raty.min.js
578 ms
um-tipsy.min.js
596 ms
masonry.min.js
574 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
689 ms
simplebar.min.js
679 ms
um-functions.min.js
672 ms
um-responsive.min.js
661 ms
um-conditional.min.js
510 ms
um-scripts.min.js
368 ms
um-profile.min.js
472 ms
um-account.min.js
472 ms
fitvids.min.js
477 ms
sbi-scripts.min.js
471 ms
autoptimize_single_b739d72c47c93702aef206eb58857289.js
474 ms
CardDesigner-Digital-ID-Laptop4.png
709 ms
BadgeMaker-Base2.png
600 ms
NewRecord-CardsOnline-iPadPro.png
703 ms
DataManager-macbook2.png
704 ms
COL-7_06.png
699 ms
Digital-ID.svg
597 ms
ID-Software-2.svg
698 ms
Solutions-2.svg
690 ms
Projects.svg
770 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
699 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
693 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffGjEGItzZg.ttf
185 ms
NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMPmCA.ttf
299 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
755 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
686 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
683 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
747 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
799 ms
analytics.js
294 ms
recaptcha__en.js
258 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
630 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
734 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.ttf
668 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffGjEGItzZg.ttf
607 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffAzHGItzZg.ttf
607 ms
NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMPmCA.ttf
588 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffBzCGItzZg.ttf
585 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffHjDGItzZg.ttf
635 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffEDBGItzZg.ttf
551 ms
gb.png
484 ms
screencheck_logo_small.png
533 ms
collect
113 ms
collect
308 ms
307675119_896341401752391_3666961597733971378_nthumb.jpg
189 ms
298016790_630834378256307_1228129702021129958_nthumb.jpg
187 ms
290004550_415688273906235_4896145272759730730_nthumb.jpg
189 ms
288331624_701934607768449_586485861032204105_nthumb.jpg
188 ms
286837433_2313370982160760_5306827125101798862_nthumb.jpg
235 ms
279245330_545565180265821_5646425338495652156_nthumb.jpg
244 ms
278655636_576008113706452_7863991820483132556_nthumb.jpg
256 ms
275692457_279050977716635_7404991036570078762_nthumb.jpg
256 ms
275098638_3169512043333488_8201111487552312000_nthumb.jpg
254 ms
ga-audiences
70 ms
screencheck.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
screencheck.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
screencheck.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screencheck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screencheck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
screencheck.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screen Check. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: