686 ms in total
21 ms
510 ms
155 ms
Welcome to screenleap.com homepage info - get ready to check Screenleap best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about screenleap.com
Free screen sharing using Screenleap. The fast, simple, and free way to share your screen instantly for online meetings, sales demos, and collaboration.
Visit screenleap.comWe analyzed Screenleap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 21 ms and then it took 665 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
screenleap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value2.7 s
96/100
10%
Value340 ms
74/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
21 ms
24 ms
39 ms
61 ms
70 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Screenleap.com, 55% (21 requests) were made to D2e4kn0wu3avrd.cloudfront.net and 8% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (87 ms) relates to the external source Syndication.twitter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 465.5 kB (52%)
894.2 kB
428.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Screenleap.com main page is 894.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 429.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Screenleap needs image optimization as it can save up to 49.6 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 289.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 289.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 109.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenleap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 109.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (44%)
36
20
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenleap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
screenleap.com
21 ms
www.screenleap.com
24 ms
style.css
39 ms
jquery.min.js
61 ms
backbone-min.js
70 ms
tools.min.js
75 ms
dev.min.js
73 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
59 ms
screenleap.min.js
73 ms
main.min.js
73 ms
sprite.gif
55 ms
header_input.png
62 ms
header_nav_border.jpg
62 ms
screenleap.png
54 ms
bg_ipad_bright2.jpg
63 ms
share_your_screen_instantly.png
55 ms
headline_arrow.png
54 ms
share_button.png
55 ms
bg_gradient_gray.png
60 ms
img_laptop_share.png
57 ms
horizontal_split_line.png
55 ms
press.png
57 ms
indicator.gif
58 ms
ga.js
42 ms
print.css
23 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
all.js
29 ms
widgets.js
6 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
42 ms
55 ms
xd_arbiter.php
46 ms
xd_arbiter.php
71 ms
ping
58 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
19 ms
like.php
52 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
67 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
71 ms
jot
87 ms
screenleap.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
screenleap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
screenleap.com SEO score
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenleap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Screenleap.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
screenleap.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Screenleap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: