1 sec in total
148 ms
685 ms
173 ms
Welcome to screenotex.com homepage info - get ready to check Screenotex best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about screenotex.com
Find here Textile Printing Machinery manufacturers, Textile Screen Printing Machine suppliers, Float Dryer traders, Flat Screen Trolleys producers, exporters, Textile Printing Machinery wholesalers, T...
Visit screenotex.comWe analyzed Screenotex.com page load time and found that the first response time was 148 ms and then it took 858 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
screenotex.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value22.8 s
0/100
25%
Value11.1 s
6/100
10%
Value2,470 ms
4/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.1 s
3/100
10%
148 ms
53 ms
55 ms
26 ms
103 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Screenotex.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (366 ms) belongs to the original domain Screenotex.com.
Page size can be reduced by 363.7 kB (72%)
502.5 kB
138.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Screenotex.com main page is 502.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 256.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 137.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 137.9 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 212.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenotex.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 212.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (51%)
35
17
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenotex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
screenotex.com
148 ms
main-style.css
53 ms
style-menu.css
55 ms
css
26 ms
js.js
103 ms
index.html
29 ms
bg.jpg
244 ms
top-menu-bg.png
53 ms
menu-table-bg.png
55 ms
logo.png
77 ms
top-menu-second-bg.png
60 ms
home.png
61 ms
top-menu-second-line.png
147 ms
contact.png
147 ms
enquiry.png
146 ms
careers.png
146 ms
optima.png
241 ms
altima.png
242 ms
unique.png
241 ms
banner-01.png
366 ms
banner-02.png
366 ms
banner-03.png
364 ms
shadow.png
243 ms
gplus-screenotex.png
243 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsMEHkXu385rSv8spHqOuvSI.ttf
5 ms
style.css
263 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
338 ms
slotmachine.js
326 ms
w037FVOUCIA
78 ms
L5bawGaC3KI
68 ms
7ZNqgC9V0RM
94 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
22 ms
www-embed-player.js
42 ms
base.js
66 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
48 ms
ad_status.js
48 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
27 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
28 ms
dc.js
31 ms
screenotex.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
screenotex.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
screenotex.com SEO score
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenotex.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Screenotex.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
screenotex.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Screenotex. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: