5.5 sec in total
1.4 sec
2.9 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Secure Anchor content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about secureanchor.com
Many business leaders are unsure how to protect their business online. We give them the skills needed to improve their cybersecurity. Get In Touch Today!
Visit secureanchor.comWe analyzed Secureanchor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
secureanchor.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value11.7 s
0/100
25%
Value15.9 s
0/100
10%
Value11,800 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value24.0 s
1/100
10%
1378 ms
25 ms
70 ms
263 ms
67 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Secureanchor.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Secure-anchor.com.
Page size can be reduced by 121.8 kB (9%)
1.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Secureanchor.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Secure Anchor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 15.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Secureanchor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (48%)
62
32
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Secure Anchor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
secure-anchor.com
1378 ms
font-awesome.css
25 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
70 ms
theme-style.css
263 ms
swiper.min.css
67 ms
font-awesome.min.css
37 ms
deprecated-style.min.css
261 ms
style.min.css
89 ms
font-awesome.min.css
92 ms
thepostgrid.min.css
97 ms
et-builder-googlefonts-cached-mod-zno03.css
241 ms
style-static.min.css
113 ms
style.css
237 ms
jquery.min.js
239 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
242 ms
js
242 ms
js
256 ms
loader.js
531 ms
et-core-unified-34.min.css
243 ms
et-core-unified-deferred-34.min.css
246 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
233 ms
jquery.raty-fa.js
233 ms
owl.carousel.js
236 ms
scripts.min.js
238 ms
common.js
240 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
239 ms
jquery.mobile.js
242 ms
v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194
351 ms
gtm.js
235 ms
624ed59e30e94d0013f026bd
252 ms
verified-vendor-seal-2022-sm.png
289 ms
SecureAnchor.Logo_.png
181 ms
SecureAnchor-HomeSlider-1.jpg
275 ms
Gartner_logo.svg_.png
177 ms
Xerox-logo.png
178 ms
microsoft-1.png
271 ms
Nouryon.jpeg
187 ms
SaudiAramco.png
180 ms
PBS.png
182 ms
satellite.png
180 ms
career-150x150.png
183 ms
screwdriver.png
183 ms
SecureAnchor-ExpertWitness-scaled.jpg
189 ms
SecureAnchor-SecurityConsulting-Slider.jpg
186 ms
SecureAnchor-Eric-Cole-Speaker-scaled.jpg
187 ms
LincolnMemorial.jpg
268 ms
Training.jpg
266 ms
Dr.-Cole-CISO-Certifcation.jpg
267 ms
Cyber-911-banner.jpg
269 ms
SecureAnchorCallToAction.jpg
275 ms
SecureAnchor-footerlogo-300x64.png
273 ms
EC.Logo_.white_-300x75.png
390 ms
facebook.png
272 ms
twitter.png
277 ms
instagram.png
389 ms
linkedin.png
276 ms
youtube.png
387 ms
analytics.js
256 ms
open-sans-normal-400.woff
180 ms
open-sans-normal-300.woff
184 ms
open-sans-normal-600.woff
181 ms
open-sans-normal-700.woff
179 ms
open-sans-normal-800.woff
244 ms
cuprum-normal-700.woff
179 ms
cuprum-normal-600.woff
247 ms
cuprum-normal-500.woff
301 ms
cuprum-normal-400.woff
301 ms
modules.ttf
180 ms
insight.min.js
118 ms
collect
22 ms
style.min.css
18 ms
collect
88 ms
ga-audiences
35 ms
22 ms
secureanchor.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
secureanchor.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
secureanchor.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Secureanchor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Secureanchor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
secureanchor.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Secure Anchor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: