7.9 sec in total
1.6 sec
6.2 sec
180 ms
Visit securewebservices.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Securewebservices content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about securewebservices.co.uk
SWS Broadband offers high speed internet connections to rural communities utilising the hybrid infrastructure of wireless and fibre gigabit-capable broadband to bridge the gap between deep rural and u...
Visit securewebservices.co.ukWe analyzed Securewebservices.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
securewebservices.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.2 s
1/100
10%
Value14.1 s
0/100
25%
Value17.1 s
0/100
10%
Value6,370 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
1572 ms
309 ms
205 ms
213 ms
423 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Securewebservices.co.uk, 21% (16 requests) were made to A.tile.openstreetmap.org and 5% (4 requests) were made to Vonageuk.7eer.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Securewebservices.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (57%)
2.6 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Securewebservices.co.uk main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Securewebservices images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 95.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Securewebservices.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 95.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (71%)
55
16
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Securewebservices. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
securewebservices.co.uk
1572 ms
cc.css
309 ms
galleria.classic.css
205 ms
livesearch.js
213 ms
datePicker.js
423 ms
tools.js
217 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
845 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.5.custom.min.js
1083 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
792 ms
jquery.activity-indicator-1.0.0.min.js
420 ms
galleria.js
953 ms
jquery.dataTables.js
1064 ms
cc.css
224 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.5.custom.css
439 ms
cc.css
323 ms
cc.css
100 ms
ga.js
9 ms
2226-126249
107 ms
2226
49 ms
getimage.php
147 ms
2226-144581
67 ms
2226-151873
81 ms
2226
49 ms
cc.css
108 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
2226
18 ms
2226
17 ms
cc.css
105 ms
cc.css
105 ms
cc.css
93 ms
thumbnails.css
100 ms
cc.css
101 ms
header.css
93 ms
footer.css
96 ms
date.css
95 ms
cc.css
99 ms
home.css
98 ms
footer-menu.css
99 ms
cc.css
100 ms
Oswald-Regular.ttf
205 ms
cc.css
101 ms
sws-coverage.html
454 ms
Arrow.png
104 ms
home.css
92 ms
cc.css
94 ms
angelina.TTF
212 ms
cc.css
99 ms
jquery-1.10.2.js
868 ms
jquery.xdr.js
210 ms
jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.min.js
948 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.18.custom.css
533 ms
swspostcodes.js
1296 ms
customerpostcodes.js
540 ms
style.css
400 ms
polymaps.min.js
877 ms
like.php
157 ms
4qFiRLLPSF7.js
21 ms
lH1ibRl5GKq.png
13 ms
333.png
862 ms
5Km.gif
806 ms
333.png
854 ms
333.png
852 ms
333.png
854 ms
334.png
856 ms
334.png
855 ms
336.png
131 ms
336.png
131 ms
335.png
132 ms
336.png
132 ms
336.png
133 ms
335.png
134 ms
335.png
132 ms
335.png
130 ms
334.png
131 ms
334.png
131 ms
securewebservices.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
securewebservices.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
securewebservices.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securewebservices.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Securewebservices.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
securewebservices.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Securewebservices. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: