2 sec in total
123 ms
1.4 sec
389 ms
Click here to check amazing Securitygem content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about securitygem.com
Simple, honest reviews you can trust. Compare top brands through in-depth research & reviews, brand comparisons, and buyers guides in the US.
Visit securitygem.comWe analyzed Securitygem.com page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
securitygem.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value2.6 s
88/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value940 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value9.6 s
29/100
10%
123 ms
601 ms
53 ms
57 ms
83 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Securitygem.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to I2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (601 ms) belongs to the original domain Securitygem.com.
Page size can be reduced by 570.5 kB (46%)
1.2 MB
659.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Securitygem.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 536.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Securitygem needs image optimization as it can save up to 68.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 284.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 284.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 154.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Securitygem.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 154.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (65%)
89
31
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Securitygem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
securitygem.com
123 ms
www.securitygem.com
601 ms
style.css
53 ms
css
57 ms
css
83 ms
skin.css
57 ms
colorbox.css
30 ms
wp-customer-reviews-generated.css.php
174 ms
styles.css
78 ms
css
113 ms
style.css
28 ms
styles.min.css
53 ms
jetpack.css
59 ms
wen-style.css
69 ms
jquery.js
70 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
66 ms
wp-customer-reviews.js
72 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
91 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
70 ms
jtwt.js
72 ms
superfish.js
76 ms
jquery.cookie.js
73 ms
scripts.js
73 ms
jq-sticky-anything.min.js
75 ms
microkids-related-posts-default.css
68 ms
easy-columns.css
77 ms
am.js
49 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
74 ms
comment-reply.min.js
77 ms
jquery.form.min.js
76 ms
scripts.js
80 ms
stickThis.js
277 ms
custom.js
62 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
65 ms
script.min.js
64 ms
wp-embed.min.js
65 ms
count.js
63 ms
e-201609.js
33 ms
style.css
66 ms
am.js
62 ms
reset.css
10 ms
nivo-slider.css
8 ms
superfish.css
11 ms
analytics.js
150 ms
prum.min.js
121 ms
improvely.js
191 ms
fbds.js
104 ms
sdk.js
104 ms
SecurityGem_logo_big.png
82 ms
xfinity-logo.png
147 ms
Xiomi-Yi.png
131 ms
DropCam_kid.png
152 ms
header_bg.png
124 ms
nav_bg.png
123 ms
nav_sep.png
117 ms
ul-dot.png
119 ms
widget_arrow.png
124 ms
footer_bg.png
128 ms
footer_widget_title_bg.png
128 ms
nav_sep.png
121 ms
sg-logo-2015-1.png
135 ms
Top_10.jpg
134 ms
ismart_iphone1.png
135 ms
nest_SG_fp.png
137 ms
homepic.gif
133 ms
twitter.png
133 ms
facebook-round-icon.png
138 ms
google+.png
146 ms
1387875803_email.png
141 ms
you_tube.png
138 ms
logowhite1.png
144 ms
canary-piper-nest-welcome.png
434 ms
Blink-Front.jpg
433 ms
dlink_vs_dropcam.png
123 ms
ADT-new-panel.png
130 ms
ULO.gif
140 ms
icamera_KEEP_01.png
139 ms
ismartalarm_premium.png
380 ms
SecurityGem_logo_big.png
79 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
154 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
177 ms
gTHiwyxi6S7iiHpqAoiE3InF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
205 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
246 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
291 ms
count.js
161 ms
overlay.png
96 ms
controls.png
97 ms
border.png
95 ms
loading_background.png
95 ms
loading.gif
94 ms
nav_sep.png
93 ms
Top_10.jpg
106 ms
homepic.gif
109 ms
twitter.png
108 ms
sg-logo-2015-1.png
106 ms
ismart_iphone1.png
127 ms
nest_SG_fp.png
154 ms
facebook-round-icon.png
120 ms
you_tube.png
119 ms
1387875803_email.png
118 ms
logowhite1.png
115 ms
google+.png
116 ms
collect
218 ms
collect
217 ms
178 ms
g.gif
59 ms
156 ms
xd_arbiter.php
128 ms
xd_arbiter.php
141 ms
5 ms
securitygem.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
securitygem.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
securitygem.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securitygem.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Securitygem.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
securitygem.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Securitygem. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: