5 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.2 sec
547 ms
Welcome to securityranking.com homepage info - get ready to check Security Ranking best content right away, or after learning these important things about securityranking.com
Security Ranking's 2020 Home Security System Reviews are based on consumer reviews to insure the consumer is guided to the best home security system.
Visit securityranking.comWe analyzed Securityranking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
securityranking.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value10,870 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.111
87/100
15%
Value16.8 s
5/100
10%
1184 ms
79 ms
38 ms
43 ms
45 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Securityranking.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Securityranking.com.
Page size can be reduced by 815.7 kB (61%)
1.3 MB
513.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Securityranking.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 903.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Security Ranking images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 587.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 587.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 146.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Securityranking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 146.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (80%)
76
15
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Security Ranking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.securityranking.com
1184 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
79 ms
jquery-ui.css
38 ms
css
43 ms
css
45 ms
css
55 ms
style.css
224 ms
shortcodes.css
183 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
148 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
155 ms
page_templates.css
156 ms
jquery.js
287 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
219 ms
cforms2012.css
231 ms
cforms.js
230 ms
addthis_widget.js
22 ms
output.css
279 ms
core.min.js
308 ms
widget.min.js
309 ms
accordion.min.js
311 ms
position.min.js
309 ms
menu.min.js
323 ms
autocomplete.min.js
348 ms
button.min.js
377 ms
datepicker.min.js
375 ms
mouse.min.js
368 ms
resizable.min.js
372 ms
draggable.min.js
381 ms
dialog.min.js
416 ms
droppable.min.js
438 ms
progressbar.min.js
436 ms
selectable.min.js
449 ms
slider.min.js
438 ms
spinner.min.js
443 ms
sortable.min.js
480 ms
tabs.min.js
502 ms
tooltip.min.js
502 ms
effect.min.js
505 ms
effect-blind.min.js
508 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
518 ms
effect-clip.min.js
543 ms
effect-drop.min.js
561 ms
effect-explode.min.js
515 ms
effect-fade.min.js
443 ms
effect-fold.min.js
441 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
447 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
445 ms
effect-size.min.js
435 ms
ga.js
6 ms
effect-scale.min.js
442 ms
effect-shake.min.js
431 ms
effect-slide.min.js
429 ms
__utm.gif
57 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
391 ms
calendar.css
390 ms
comment-reply.min.js
463 ms
superfish.js
462 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
463 ms
custom.js
462 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
450 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
425 ms
et-ptemplates-frontend.js
513 ms
wp-embed.min.js
511 ms
analytics.js
67 ms
SecurityRankingLogo353_752.png
178 ms
GreenShield11.png
178 ms
Frontpoint_Full_Horiz_RGB.png
376 ms
protect-america.png
179 ms
life-shield-logo.jpg
179 ms
ADT-logo.png
180 ms
Vivint-Home-Security-300x123.png
376 ms
google.png
194 ms
facebook.png
195 ms
twitter.png
372 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
98 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
98 ms
collect
85 ms
300lo.json
66 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
35 ms
securityranking.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
securityranking.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
securityranking.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securityranking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Securityranking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
securityranking.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Security Ranking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: