7.4 sec in total
2.5 sec
4.8 sec
205 ms
Click here to check amazing Service Centre content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about servicecentre.co
Service Centre Information with Reviews
Visit servicecentre.coWe analyzed Servicecentre.co page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
servicecentre.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
97/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value6.1 s
44/100
10%
Value420 ms
66/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
2484 ms
25 ms
499 ms
752 ms
519 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Servicecentre.co, 20% (12 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net and 17% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Servicecentre.co.
Page size can be reduced by 836.6 kB (77%)
1.1 MB
249.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Servicecentre.co main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 661.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 596.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 596.6 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Service Centre images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 149.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 149.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Servicecentre.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.7 kB or 96% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (58%)
57
24
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Service Centre. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
servicecentre.co
2484 ms
css
25 ms
modernizr.min.js.pagespeed.jm.Vu_1TqlBgm.js
499 ms
A.bootstrap.min.css,qver=3.0.pagespeed.cf.piJ9fr4111.css
752 ms
A.js_composer_front_custom.css,qver=4.3.5.pagespeed.cf.34TgD2MWTC.css
519 ms
A.font-awesome.min.css,qver=1.9.4.pagespeed.cf.HpcIsdYD5q.css
527 ms
custom.css
782 ms
custom-css.php
1527 ms
jquery.js,qver=1.11.3.pagespeed.jm.zixJPNMRNN.js
1036 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js,qver=1.2.1.pagespeed.jm.mhpNjdU8Wl.js
796 ms
underscore.min.js,,qver==1.6.0,Mjm.OxvcirmpIL.js+backbone.min.js,,qver==1.1.2,Mjm.U2mx7qxGL-.js.pagespeed.jc.Pz1zQWSRQU.js
274 ms
plupload.full.min.js,qver=2.1.8.pagespeed.jm.HFV--1VVGK.js
725 ms
plupload.full.min.js
772 ms
jquery.validate.min.js.pagespeed.jm.37t9D6To4j.js
516 ms
js,qsensor=false,asigned_in=false,aver=1.pagespeed.jm.6BDVR71wtQ.js
15 ms
gmap.js.pagespeed.jm.fpAdBupUTH.js
548 ms
bootstrap.min.js,qver=1.9.4.pagespeed.jm.Y46T8iQ2O7.js
767 ms
slider-bt.js,qver=1.pagespeed.jm.bd0sB50gSm.js
779 ms
jquery.magnific-raty.js,qver=1.pagespeed.jm.7AH0MAaoAj.js
825 ms
jquery.lazyload.js,,qver==1,Mjm.yHU4kP6Nnq.js+jquery.timepicker.min.js,,qver==1,Mjm.mR5ae3OuRy.js.pagespeed.jc.VwOt0zSpWF.js
981 ms
marionette.js
1035 ms
wp-content,_themes,_directoryengine,_includes,_aecore,_assets,_js,_appengine.js,,qver==1,Mjm.XS4sbzyEgM.js+wp-content,_themes,_directoryengine,_js,_functions.js,,qver==1.9.4,Mjm.dcVYcyqDVG.js+wp-includes,_js,_comment-reply.min.js.pagespeed.jc.tLQRA0FaPa.js
1059 ms
marker.js,qver=1.pagespeed.jm.soBwl9PUb5.js
1302 ms
gnmenu.js
1101 ms
front.js,,qver==1.9.4,Mjm.3xu5cuhqLX.js+index.js,,qver==1,Mjm.Uigjp3nq4t.js.pagespeed.jc.kNmB93Y0ik.js
1239 ms
js_composer_front.js
1242 ms
xpopup-close-light.png.pagespeed.ic.y2cmGdwSD-.png
273 ms
xUntitled2.png.pagespeed.ic.9Y-0knvqrl.png
533 ms
xquote.png.pagespeed.ic.MvCGZL7EHC.png
405 ms
sdk.js
14 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
965 ms
197 ms
xd_arbiter.php
78 ms
xd_arbiter.php
85 ms
analytics.js
97 ms
collect
15 ms
page.php
183 ms
McLpmVM3wCm.css
42 ms
VH4VPudaxfN.css
35 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
47 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
58 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
45 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
43 ms
12728796_684730938333390_6343820450469996920_n.png
41 ms
12072705_636079403198544_3735027603553903102_n.png
14 ms
1934794_799729396826020_3191152933118365861_n.jpg
19 ms
12809655_991686490910930_5543808108792705654_n.jpg
19 ms
12250008_1072564149444972_1771934003997139271_n.jpg
17 ms
12143082_881832985218124_329609604875641184_n.jpg
14 ms
12075086_892350074194377_486561486663719549_n.jpg
16 ms
250058_1691803191036824_5147066566667662303_n.jpg
17 ms
10382152_1585693881660919_5293401118338278699_n.jpg
21 ms
10354686_10150004552801856_220367501106153455_n.jpg
20 ms
12553009_930049287081246_2210539467133771906_n.jpg
19 ms
10337745_437763573092810_8478406744084964985_n.jpg
22 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
12 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
10 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
5 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
5 ms
lazyload.1.0.2.min.js
274 ms
servicecentre.co accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
servicecentre.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
servicecentre.co SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Servicecentre.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Servicecentre.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
servicecentre.co
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Service Centre. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: