2.7 sec in total
840 ms
1.7 sec
145 ms
Visit servicesreview.net now to see the best up-to-date Servicesreview content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about servicesreview.net
If you are looking for the services review to be able to make your decision - www.servicesreview.net is the right place for that! Check our reviews out!
Visit servicesreview.netWe analyzed Servicesreview.net page load time and found that the first response time was 840 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
servicesreview.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
95/100
10%
Value1.7 s
99/100
25%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
840 ms
145 ms
26 ms
208 ms
148 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Servicesreview.net, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (840 ms) belongs to the original domain Servicesreview.net.
Page size can be reduced by 189.8 kB (56%)
336.9 kB
147.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Servicesreview.net main page is 336.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 242.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Servicesreview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 148.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 148.3 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Servicesreview.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (48%)
27
14
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Servicesreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.servicesreview.net
840 ms
style.css
145 ms
css
26 ms
jquery.min.js
208 ms
custom.js
148 ms
jqueryslidemenu.js
150 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
147 ms
styles.css
128 ms
jquery.js
413 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
293 ms
comment-reply.min.js
222 ms
jquery.form.min.js
248 ms
scripts.js
247 ms
nivo-slider.css
171 ms
ga.js
11 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
121 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
bg.jpg
197 ms
feed.png
130 ms
logo.png
134 ms
e-mail-marketing-services-review.gif
101 ms
bg-nav.gif
135 ms
bg-search.png
136 ms
search-btn.png
175 ms
bg-shadow-top.png
194 ms
bg-sb.png
199 ms
bg-sb-top.png
201 ms
bg-sb-bot.png
200 ms
0IZPA9DbzKXnGZABsAivT50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
17 ms
servicesreview.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
servicesreview.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
servicesreview.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Servicesreview.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Servicesreview.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
servicesreview.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Servicesreview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: