5.8 sec in total
1.8 sec
3.8 sec
229 ms
Visit sghostcompare.com now to see the best up-to-date SG Host Compare content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sghostcompare.com
SG Host Compare provides comparison and reviews of the Top 10 web and cloud hosting providers in Singapore since 2008.
Visit sghostcompare.comWe analyzed Sghostcompare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
sghostcompare.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value6.4 s
9/100
25%
Value18.6 s
0/100
10%
Value12,570 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value23.3 s
1/100
10%
1775 ms
525 ms
782 ms
521 ms
530 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Sghostcompare.com, 34% (28 requests) were made to S0.2mdn.net and 11% (9 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Sghostcompare.com.
Page size can be reduced by 156.9 kB (23%)
678.9 kB
522.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Sghostcompare.com main page is 678.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 326.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.0 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SG Host Compare needs image optimization as it can save up to 49.9 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 61.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.8 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 712 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sghostcompare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 712 B or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (38%)
80
50
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SG Host Compare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
sghostcompare.com
1775 ms
style.css
525 ms
mootools-core.js
782 ms
core.js
521 ms
caption.js
530 ms
mootools-more.js
1063 ms
styles.css
769 ms
element.js
68 ms
adsbygoogle.js
32 ms
show_ads.js
59 ms
topp.gif
305 ms
logo.png
277 ms
tickpic.png
276 ms
vodien.gif
305 ms
45.png
278 ms
oryon.gif
305 ms
qoxy.gif
536 ms
crosspic.png
539 ms
exabytes.gif
549 ms
4.png
552 ms
readyspace.gif
560 ms
singhost.gif
554 ms
nmx.gif
800 ms
35.png
808 ms
hostsg.gif
822 ms
poznet.gif
827 ms
usonyx.gif
830 ms
topg.gif
781 ms
zrt_lookup.html
72 ms
show_ads_impl.js
120 ms
cm
166 ms
mootree_loader.gif
888 ms
analytics.js
26 ms
collect
9 ms
collect
123 ms
cookie.js
86 ms
integrator.js
103 ms
ads
440 ms
ads
840 ms
invalid
9 ms
express_html_inpage_rendering_lib_200_276.js
39 ms
UFYwWwmt.js
27 ms
m_js_controller.js
31 ms
window_focus.js
52 ms
qs_click_protection.js
52 ms
rx_lidar.js
52 ms
abg_lite.js
117 ms
icon.png
112 ms
Enqz_20U.html
86 ms
activeview
14 ms
index.html
5 ms
YrdBSjzfIHcYhYLmavhSyO_EhBrLUWpx5ykdL7H9Kqg.js
9 ms
gsap_3.5.1_min.js
26 ms
banner.min.js
11 ms
lounge_town_with_hat.jpg
14 ms
long_hair_groovy_chair.jpg
14 ms
chandigar_cherries.jpg
29 ms
red_dress_green_chair.jpg
29 ms
silly_straw_silly_chair.jpg
31 ms
corbuisier_pineapple.jpg
31 ms
long_chair_big_umbrella.jpg
32 ms
mies_van_der_olive.jpg
29 ms
blondebeard_whitechair.jpg
30 ms
martini_head.jpg
30 ms
silly_straw_eames.jpg
31 ms
logo.png
32 ms
img_1.jpg
32 ms
txt_1_5.png
33 ms
txt_1_4.png
33 ms
txt_1_3.png
34 ms
txt_1_2.png
34 ms
txt_1_1.png
35 ms
txt_4_1.png
34 ms
txt_4_0.png
35 ms
img_5_2.jpg
35 ms
img_5_1.jpg
36 ms
txt_5_2.png
36 ms
txt_5_1.png
38 ms
6800694383428313543
98 ms
s
42 ms
one_click_handler_one_afma.js
4 ms
icon.png
7 ms
activeview
23 ms
sghostcompare.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
sghostcompare.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
sghostcompare.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sghostcompare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sghostcompare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sghostcompare.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SG Host Compare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: