Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

shadowfoam.com

Shadow Foam® | Toolbox Foam | Tool Foam Inserts for your Toolboxes

Page Load Speed

8.7 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

2 sec

shadowfoam.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to shadowfoam.com homepage info - get ready to check Shadow Foam best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about shadowfoam.com

Shadow Foam is the market-leading product to organise or packout your tools. Popular brands like Snap-on tool box, Dewalt, Makita, Festool, Bosch and more can be organised with Shadow Foam.

Visit shadowfoam.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shadowfoam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shadowfoam.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,360 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.067

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shadowfoam.com

1427 ms

gtm.js

48 ms

js

66 ms

preloads.js

65 ms

138 ms

Our browser made a total of 185 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (142 requests) were addressed to the original Shadowfoam.com, 6% (11 requests) were made to Cdn.shopify.com and 4% (7 requests) were made to Static.klaviyo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Shadowfoam.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (18%)

Content Size

9.5 MB

After Optimization

7.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Shadowfoam.com main page is 9.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 174.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 6.4 MB
  • After minification 6.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shadow Foam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 159.0 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 1.2 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 159.0 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 30.2 kB

  • Original 108.2 kB
  • After minification 107.9 kB
  • After compression 78.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shadowfoam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.2 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (26%)

Requests Now

171

After Optimization

126

The browser has sent 171 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shadow Foam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

shadowfoam.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

shadowfoam.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

shadowfoam.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shadowfoam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shadowfoam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shadow Foam. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: