Tools & Wizards About Us
shagle.es screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

Page Load Speed

260 ms in total

First Response

31 ms

Resources Loaded

98 ms

Page Rendered

131 ms

shagle.es screenshot

About Website

Visit shagle.es now to see the best up-to-date Shagle content for Chile and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shagle.es

Visit shagle.es

Key Findings

We analyzed Shagle.es page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 229 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shagle.es performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shagle.es

31 ms

cf.errors.css

5 ms

zepto.min.js

11 ms

cf.common.js

8 ms

opensans-400.woff

4 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Shagle.es and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (31 ms) belongs to the original domain Shagle.es.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 45.3 kB (73%)

Content Size

62.0 kB

After Optimization

16.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shagle.es main page is 62.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 29.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 3.4 kB
  • After minification 3.0 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 29.4 kB
  • After minification 28.3 kB
  • After compression 10.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 24.4 kB

  • Original 29.3 kB
  • After minification 29.2 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shagle.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shagle. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

shagle.es

shagle.es

31 ms

cf.errors.css

cf.errors.css

5 ms

zepto.min.js

zepto.min.js

11 ms

cf.common.js

cf.common.js

8 ms

opensans-400.woff

opensans-400.woff

4 ms

opensans-300.woff

opensans-300.woff

4 ms

opensans-600.woff

opensans-600.woff

10 ms

opensans-700.woff

opensans-700.woff

9 ms

Accessibility Review

shagle.es accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

shagle.es best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

shagle.es SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shagle.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Shagle.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

shagle.es

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shagle. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: