Tools & Wizards About Us
sharefx.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 55

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

sharefx.com

Domain Default page

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

456 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

122 ms

sharefx.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sharefx.com now to see the best up-to-date Sharefx content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sharefx.com

Download Service Manuals, Schematics and Electronic Documents. Best Resource on the Net

Visit sharefx.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sharefx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 456 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sharefx.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sharefx.com

456 ms

font-awesome.css

321 ms

custom-font.css

204 ms

css

25 ms

bootstrap.min.css

591 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Sharefx.com, 17% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 13% (7 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (628 ms) belongs to the original domain Sharefx.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (69%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

503.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sharefx.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 272.8 kB

  • Original 339.3 kB
  • After minification 332.4 kB
  • After compression 66.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 272.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 52.7 kB

  • Original 71.7 kB
  • After minification 19.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sharefx needs image optimization as it can save up to 52.7 kB or 73% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 637.1 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 382.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 637.1 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 170.3 kB

  • Original 206.0 kB
  • After minification 184.7 kB
  • After compression 35.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sharefx.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 170.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (73%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sharefx. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sharefx.com

sharefx.com

456 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

321 ms

custom-font.css

custom-font.css

204 ms

css

css

25 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

591 ms

style.css

style.css

530 ms

prefixfree.min.js

prefixfree.min.js

327 ms

theme-responsive.css

theme-responsive.css

206 ms

element.js

element.js

37 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

16 ms

less-1.7.0.min.js

less-1.7.0.min.js

614 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

223 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

628 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

330 ms

theme.js

theme.js

341 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

429 ms

search_icon.png

search_icon.png

310 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

101 ms

paypal_logo.png

paypal_logo.png

108 ms

google-play-badge.png

google-play-badge.png

214 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

189 ms

custom-font.css

custom-font.css

127 ms

css

css

28 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

244 ms

style.css

style.css

277 ms

theme-responsive.css

theme-responsive.css

204 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

84 ms

translateelement.css

translateelement.css

276 ms

main.js

main.js

354 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3bO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3bO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff

11 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTaRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTaRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff

29 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff

39 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzKRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzKRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff

36 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff

37 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

256 ms

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBrrIa-7acMAeDBVuclsi6Gc.woff

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBrrIa-7acMAeDBVuclsi6Gc.woff

37 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxvR_54zmj3SbGZQh3vCOwvY.woff

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxvR_54zmj3SbGZQh3vCOwvY.woff

38 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxuw_rQOTGi-AJs5XCWaKIhU.woff

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxuw_rQOTGi-AJs5XCWaKIhU.woff

39 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxsBo4hlZyBvkZICS3KpNonM.woff

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxsBo4hlZyBvkZICS3KpNonM.woff

39 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

72 ms

element_main.js

element_main.js

190 ms

collect

collect

163 ms

translateelement.css

translateelement.css

143 ms

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

175 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

63 ms

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

49 ms

translate_24dp.png

translate_24dp.png

45 ms

l

l

94 ms

cleardot.gif

cleardot.gif

120 ms

translateelement.css

translateelement.css

96 ms

layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js

layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js

9 ms

te_ctrl3.gif

te_ctrl3.gif

13 ms

Accessibility Review

sharefx.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

sharefx.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

sharefx.com SEO score

55

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sharefx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sharefx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sharefx.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sharefx. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: