Tools & Wizards About Us
shaverlist.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

shaverlist.com

Best Electric Shaver Reviews 2023 (For Men and Women)

Page Load Speed

27.2 sec in total

First Response

625 ms

Resources Loaded

25.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

shaverlist.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Shaver List content for Bangladesh. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about shaverlist.com

See our list of the best electric shaver, and best selling grooming tools for 2023. Read our honest electric razor reviews and efficient shaving tips.

Visit shaverlist.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shaverlist.com page load time and found that the first response time was 625 ms and then it took 26.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

shaverlist.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,320 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.131

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.shaverlist.com

625 ms

css

308 ms

238 ms

661 ms

M9bPKixNLarUMYYydHMz04sSS1L1cjPzAA.js

350 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Shaverlist.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.5 sec) relates to the external source Freegeoip.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 165.9 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Shaverlist.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 34.5 kB

  • Original 46.7 kB
  • After minification 46.0 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shaver List images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 130.2 kB

  • Original 196.5 kB
  • After minification 196.4 kB
  • After compression 66.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 130.2 kB or 66% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (34%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shaver List. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.shaverlist.com

www.shaverlist.com

625 ms

css

css

308 ms

238 ms

661 ms

M9bPKixNLarUMYYydHMz04sSS1L1cjPzAA.js

M9bPKixNLarUMYYydHMz04sSS1L1cjPzAA.js

350 ms

335 ms

jsapi

jsapi

300 ms

amazon_linker.min.js

amazon_linker.min.js

205 ms

460 ms

622 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

763 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

138 ms

logo-shaverlist.png

logo-shaverlist.png

131 ms

searchbox.png

searchbox.png

117 ms

main-menu-btm-border.png

main-menu-btm-border.png

119 ms

shaver3d-4.png

shaver3d-4.png

962 ms

top-shaver-icon.png

top-shaver-icon.png

185 ms

head-shaver.png

head-shaver.png

120 ms

beardtrimmer.png

beardtrimmer.png

244 ms

bodyhairtrimmer.png

bodyhairtrimmer.png

279 ms

earnosetrimmer.png

earnosetrimmer.png

188 ms

epilator-icon.png

epilator-icon.png

309 ms

Braun-Series-7-790ccadsmall.jpg

Braun-Series-7-790ccadsmall.jpg

741 ms

Braun-Series-7-790ccad.jpg

Braun-Series-7-790ccad.jpg

859 ms

bald-eagle-hea-shaver-ad-small.jpg

bald-eagle-hea-shaver-ad-small.jpg

799 ms

bald-eagle-hea-shaver-ad.jpg

bald-eagle-hea-shaver-ad.jpg

803 ms

Philips-QT4070-small.jpg

Philips-QT4070-small.jpg

1031 ms

Philips-QT4070.jpg

Philips-QT4070.jpg

1126 ms

Emjoi-ap-18-small.jpg

Emjoi-ap-18-small.jpg

1043 ms

Emjoi-ap-18.jpg

Emjoi-ap-18.jpg

1100 ms

heading_underline.png

heading_underline.png

931 ms

Philips-Norelco-9100-PIC1-110x67_c.jpg

Philips-Norelco-9100-PIC1-110x67_c.jpg

1003 ms

img5483df8478625_l-110x67_c.jpg

img5483df8478625_l-110x67_c.jpg

1038 ms

Panasonic-ESLV95-s-110x67_c.png

Panasonic-ESLV95-s-110x67_c.png

1087 ms

Philips-Norelco-YS52441-Click-Style-Shave-Toolkit-110x67_c.jpg

Philips-Norelco-YS52441-Click-Style-Shave-Toolkit-110x67_c.jpg

1111 ms

gray.png

gray.png

1139 ms

yellow.png

yellow.png

1118 ms

fbicon.jpg

fbicon.jpg

158 ms

admin-ajax.php

admin-ajax.php

2674 ms

auto-arrows.png

auto-arrows.png

1075 ms

7XUFZ5tgS-tD6QamInJTcU3KvHLhcNjEHFQzwNtdMQY.ttf

7XUFZ5tgS-tD6QamInJTcU3KvHLhcNjEHFQzwNtdMQY.ttf

619 ms

collect

collect

51 ms

collect

collect

644 ms

19531 ms

Accessibility Review

shaverlist.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

shaverlist.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

shaverlist.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shaverlist.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shaverlist.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

shaverlist.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shaver List. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: