6.4 sec in total
1.5 sec
4.6 sec
253 ms
Click here to check amazing Shield Uk content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about shield-uk.com
Shield offer Solar & Safety Window Films, Manifestation Graphics, Bomb Blast Mitigation Window Film to all business in and around London.
Visit shield-uk.comWe analyzed Shield-uk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
shield-uk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value12.6 s
0/100
25%
Value12.0 s
4/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.641
9/100
15%
Value8.8 s
35/100
10%
1548 ms
240 ms
166 ms
248 ms
17 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Shield-uk.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Shield-uk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 174.3 kB (12%)
1.5 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Shield-uk.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 986.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shield Uk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 40.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shield-uk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (71%)
55
16
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shield Uk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.shield-uk.com
1548 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
240 ms
Unboxed_grey.css
166 ms
layerslider.css
248 ms
css
17 ms
styles.css
169 ms
settings.css
293 ms
style.css
251 ms
style.css
255 ms
base.css
289 ms
layout.css
480 ms
shortcodes.css
497 ms
animations.min.css
338 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
342 ms
prettyPhoto.css
389 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
390 ms
responsive.css
502 ms
css
26 ms
jquery.js
674 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
486 ms
PrettyFileList.js
485 ms
greensock.js
640 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
697 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
586 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
747 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
664 ms
scripts.js
562 ms
uk-cookie-consent-js.js
574 ms
core.min.js
618 ms
widget.min.js
619 ms
mouse.min.js
624 ms
sortable.min.js
648 ms
tabs.min.js
658 ms
accordion.min.js
653 ms
plugins.js
817 ms
menu.js
658 ms
animations.min.js
690 ms
jplayer.min.js
708 ms
translate3d.js
710 ms
scripts.js
740 ms
comment-reply.min.js
744 ms
wp-embed.min.js
739 ms
shield-logo.png
317 ms
slide2.jpg
595 ms
shield-slide2-1.jpg
558 ms
shield-1.jpg
725 ms
home_energy_box_3.jpg
304 ms
privacy-glass-1.png
394 ms
bomb.jpg
395 ms
shield-logo-bw.png
415 ms
arrow-1.png
476 ms
bg2-2.jpg
578 ms
box_shadow.png
484 ms
7Auup_AqnyWWAxW2Wk3swUz56MS91Eww8cLx1nejpw.ttf
11 ms
7Auup_AqnyWWAxW2Wk3swUz56MS91Eww8SX21nejpw.ttf
16 ms
mfn-icons.woff
613 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
353 ms
box_shadow_button.png
341 ms
loader.gif
102 ms
shield-uk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
shield-uk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
shield-uk.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shield-uk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shield-uk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shield-uk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shield Uk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: