2.9 sec in total
173 ms
2.3 sec
447 ms
Click here to check amazing Sift Digital content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about siftdigital.com
Revamp your accounting firm's digital presence with our expert marketing for accountants. Stunning website design, effective SEO, and insightful content. We'll help you stand out!
Visit siftdigital.comWe analyzed Siftdigital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
siftdigital.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value4.7 s
68/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.07
96/100
15%
Value4.8 s
79/100
10%
173 ms
455 ms
362 ms
372 ms
472 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Siftdigital.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Dashboard.whoisvisiting.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Wd-edge.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (884 ms) belongs to the original domain Siftdigital.com.
Page size can be reduced by 463.8 kB (56%)
828.2 kB
364.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Siftdigital.com main page is 828.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 365.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sift Digital needs image optimization as it can save up to 85.8 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 146.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 146.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 214.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Siftdigital.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 214.1 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (41%)
37
22
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sift Digital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
siftdigital.com
173 ms
www.siftdigital.com
455 ms
css_SV-c94HOyywCuMi8wU_z0nohfJKM1XO099UDISDAhtQ.css
362 ms
css_HG3zzCQWU_SgW-2fcU1aJNt2ZJ0xRhQWtQvjJfSZSNQ.css
372 ms
css_IWiNK11WV6FrL_F1jKX4BgVW2adLEaFvvZzC9dXefGA.css
472 ms
js_CNo5XlHyFB30gusOOzARjmshHqvAXSc-EkiTXKjww90.js
722 ms
js_F_3oaIUSKLcp4pFl3BWxN-LK7ipWPsLcUUuWY4jMQPo.js
412 ms
buttons.js
6 ms
who.js
271 ms
logo.png
170 ms
slider-right.png
171 ms
Cancer-Research-UK-thumb_05_05_05.png
884 ms
Amnesty-thumb_05_05.jpg
689 ms
Nokia-link_05_05.jpg
687 ms
footer-twb.png
424 ms
footer-sd-logo-white.png
625 ms
gtm.js
164 ms
sift-pattern-white.png
321 ms
grey-pattern.gif
390 ms
sd_logo.svg
248 ms
chevron-blue.png
329 ms
footer-pattern-blue.png
483 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
115 ms
Content-images_02_4.png
424 ms
c4352a95-7a41-48c1-83ce-d8ffd2a3b118.woff
320 ms
7658dda6-217a-406c-bcb8-7551f88e2c49.woff
404 ms
5a05cf7f-f332-456f-ae67-d8c26e0d35b3.woff
574 ms
939cba03-5b40-4d01-9bc5-7589eca863db.woff
566 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
651 ms
analytics.js
14 ms
collect
16 ms
collect
71 ms
who.ashx
198 ms
getSegment.php
169 ms
checkOAuth.esi
4 ms
t.dhj
50 ms
t.dhj
42 ms
cm
31 ms
x35248
113 ms
s-3271.xgi
14 ms
hbpix
27 ms
10 ms
xrefid.xgi
17 ms
pixel
15 ms
10 ms
pixel
15 ms
2981
25 ms
siftdigital.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
siftdigital.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
siftdigital.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Siftdigital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Siftdigital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
siftdigital.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sift Digital. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: