Access silencenogood.net. Silence Nogood

Report Summary

About Website

Visit silencenogood.net now to see the best up-to-date Silence Nogood content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about silencenogood.net

Know Good Music

Visit silencenogood.net

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

silencenogood.net

195 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

110 ms

diggdigg-style.css

78 ms

meteor-slides.css

80 ms

pagenavi-css.css

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Silencenogood.net, 27% (28 requests) were made to W.soundcloud.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (804 ms) relates to the external source W.soundcloud.com.

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Silencenogood.net main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 50.7 kB

Original 65.2 kB
After minification 63.4 kB
After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 170.6 kB

Original 1.4 MB
After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Silence Nogood needs image optimization as it can save up to 170.6 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 371.4 kB

Original 538.3 kB
After minification 500.2 kB
After compression 166.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 371.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 233.8 kB

Original 461.3 kB
After minification 454.8 kB
After compression 227.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Silencenogood.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 233.8 kB or 51% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Silence Nogood. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Silencenogood.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Silencenogood.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

silencenogood.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Silence Nogood. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Silence Nogood - Know Good Music

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)