2.3 sec in total
245 ms
1.9 sec
107 ms
Welcome to simpac.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Simpac best content right away, or after learning these important things about simpac.co.uk
Simpac paper sack manufacturers and packaging suppliers. Supplier of potato sacks, mailing bags, carrier bags, refuse sacks, bin liners, aluminium foil, cling film.
Visit simpac.co.ukWe analyzed Simpac.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 245 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
simpac.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value17.9 s
0/100
25%
Value17.8 s
0/100
10%
Value1,350 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.252
49/100
15%
Value19.6 s
2/100
10%
245 ms
539 ms
147 ms
370 ms
75 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Simpac.co.uk, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (582 ms) belongs to the original domain Simpac.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 12.1 kB (36%)
33.3 kB
21.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Simpac.co.uk main page is 33.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 17.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (42%)
45
26
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Simpac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
simpac.co.uk
245 ms
www.simpac.co.uk
539 ms
site_packaged.css
147 ms
site_packaged.js
370 ms
bg_header_fade.png
75 ms
logo.png
77 ms
f_id.png
147 ms
f_vn.png
148 ms
f_cn.png
150 ms
f_nl.png
151 ms
f_pl.png
151 ms
f_ru.png
152 ms
f_ro.png
219 ms
f_hu.png
220 ms
f_es.png
220 ms
f_it.png
222 ms
f_fr.png
223 ms
f_de.png
224 ms
f_gb.png
292 ms
b_search.png
292 ms
nav_separator.png
293 ms
bg_banner_home_banner.jpg
367 ms
bg_banner_home1_banner.jpg
366 ms
bg_banner_home2_banner.jpg
296 ms
bg_banner_home3_banner.jpg
436 ms
bg_banner_home4_banner.jpg
435 ms
bg_banner_home_banner_v2_banner.jpg
436 ms
bg_footer_fade.png
367 ms
bg_scroll_prev.png
439 ms
IMG_8131_small_list.jpg
437 ms
IMG_8232_paperbags_small_list.jpg
440 ms
IMG_8227_degradablepoly_small_list.jpg
508 ms
IMG_8220_small_list.jpg
510 ms
IMG_8319_householdrefuse_small_list.jpg
511 ms
Trust_range_standing_small_list.jpg
512 ms
IMG_5740_small_list.jpg
512 ms
freezer_small_list.jpg
513 ms
Cling_Feb15_small_list.jpg
581 ms
Millies_standing_small_list.jpg
582 ms
ga.js
13 ms
IMG_8282_bakingpaper_small_list.jpg
561 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
IMG_8324_nappy_small_list.jpg
515 ms
IMG_8333_trolley_main_small_list.jpg
514 ms
IMG_8329_suitcover_small_list.jpg
445 ms
bg_scroll_next.png
510 ms
print_packaged.css
76 ms
simpac.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
simpac.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
simpac.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Simpac.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Simpac.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
simpac.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Simpac. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: