3.6 sec in total
35 ms
3 sec
579 ms
Visit sitesafetyplan.com now to see the best up-to-date Sitesafetyplan content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sitesafetyplan.com
Visit sitesafetyplan.comWe analyzed Sitesafetyplan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 35 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
sitesafetyplan.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value14.9 s
0/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value3,660 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
35 ms
132 ms
236 ms
321 ms
319 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Sitesafetyplan.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Youtube.com.
Page size can be reduced by 381.1 kB (31%)
1.2 MB
848.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Sitesafetyplan.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 569.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by -8 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sitesafetyplan images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 48.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.3 kB or 39% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 332.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitesafetyplan.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 332.8 kB or 58% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (47%)
43
23
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sitesafetyplan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sitesafetyplan.com
35 ms
sitesafetyplan.com
132 ms
js
236 ms
js
321 ms
css
319 ms
bootstrap.css
69 ms
style.css
137 ms
bootstrap_og.css
226 ms
style_og.css
244 ms
fonts_og.css
181 ms
A2mdz9l4M1A
609 ms
core.min.js
493 ms
script.js
285 ms
warning_bar_0000_us.jpg
284 ms
SSP_Logo_329X70.png
347 ms
HapagLoyd-Container-3.jpg
583 ms
Industrial_plumbing.jpg
597 ms
Team_In_front_tanks.jpg
581 ms
Utilities_652X435.jpg
566 ms
Construction_Industry.jpg
568 ms
Industrial_landscaping.jpg
570 ms
slider-slide-2-1920x1080.jpg
570 ms
Industrial_electrical.jpg
580 ms
analytics.js
309 ms
js
305 ms
www-player.css
915 ms
www-embed-player.js
1035 ms
base.js
1396 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
904 ms
conversion_async.js
1048 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
1038 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
1133 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
1226 ms
Linearicons.ttf
1133 ms
Linearicons.ttf
1132 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
914 ms
collect
67 ms
slider-slide-1-1920x1080.png
293 ms
ust_pull_bg_2048X1057.jpg
291 ms
slider-slide-3_1-1920x1080.png
513 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
433 ms
collect
320 ms
440 ms
177 ms
481 ms
ga-audiences
335 ms
ad_status.js
198 ms
189 ms
id
185 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
184 ms
zVL0qRr3dbQ5f-Xr-uvCrkOcgLrlGoDuIshvtmLe0dw.js
115 ms
embed.js
51 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
71 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
15 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
16 ms
Create
255 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
47 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
15 ms
sitesafetyplan.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sitesafetyplan.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
sitesafetyplan.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitesafetyplan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sitesafetyplan.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
sitesafetyplan.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sitesafetyplan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: