2.7 sec in total
618 ms
1.8 sec
297 ms
Click here to check amazing Site Selection content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about siteselection.com
Site Selection magazine is an internationally circulated business publication covering corporate real estate and economic development.
Visit siteselection.comWe analyzed Siteselection.com page load time and found that the first response time was 618 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
siteselection.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value20.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value1,760 ms
10/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.2 s
7/100
10%
618 ms
97 ms
65 ms
94 ms
77 ms
Our browser made a total of 123 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Siteselection.com, 20% (24 requests) were made to G.adspeed.net and 8% (10 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (618 ms) belongs to the original domain Siteselection.com.
Page size can be reduced by 933.0 kB (45%)
2.1 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Siteselection.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 872.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 240.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 240.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 109.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Site Selection needs image optimization as it can save up to 109.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 343.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 343.6 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 239.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Siteselection.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 239.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (59%)
109
45
The browser has sent 109 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Site Selection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
siteselection.com
618 ms
default.css
97 ms
portalMenu.css
65 ms
sscore.css
94 ms
portalStyles.css
77 ms
jquery-ui-1.7.2.custom-homepage.css
125 ms
cover.css
92 ms
browser-all.js
109 ms
uikit.css
180 ms
devLogger.js
111 ms
interfaceUtils.js
118 ms
contentFrameUtils.js
109 ms
api.js
78 ms
jquery.min.js
44 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
62 ms
uikit.min.js
172 ms
platform.js
166 ms
commonspot.css
168 ms
always-include-common.js
166 ms
always-include-moz.js
166 ms
ad.php
263 ms
ad.php
285 ms
element.js
54 ms
style.css
226 ms
jquery.min.js
38 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
228 ms
testimonials.js
221 ms
ad.php
200 ms
ad.php
218 ms
ga.js
31 ms
__utm.gif
94 ms
recaptcha__en.js
122 ms
twitter22px.gif
123 ms
linkedin22px.gif
124 ms
facebook22px.gif
126 ms
email22px.gif
122 ms
rss.png
124 ms
cover.jpg
126 ms
94199-B.jpg
162 ms
94223-B.jpg
164 ms
94280-B.jpg
165 ms
94328-B.jpg
170 ms
94343-B.jpg
169 ms
portalLogoBLUE.gif
92 ms
ss-horizontal.jpg
102 ms
cover.jpg
131 ms
arrow.png
101 ms
1511CoverTiny.jpg
101 ms
1509CoverTiny.jpg
90 ms
cover.jpg
195 ms
1505CoverTiny.jpg
107 ms
1503CoverTiny.jpg
161 ms
1501CoverTiny.jpg
164 ms
collect
86 ms
145874.1428341368.jpg
142 ms
ad.php
152 ms
229943.1430930490.jpg
150 ms
ad.php
150 ms
cse.js
70 ms
translateelement.css
71 ms
main.js
99 ms
twitter22px.gif
42 ms
email22px.gif
46 ms
linkedin22px.gif
57 ms
rss.png
60 ms
facebook22px.gif
58 ms
cover.jpg
521 ms
jsapi
52 ms
94199-B.jpg
42 ms
94223-B.jpg
45 ms
94280-B.jpg
474 ms
94343-B.jpg
97 ms
94328-B.jpg
36 ms
ad.php
305 ms
ad.php
302 ms
element_main.js
40 ms
list_back.gif
62 ms
default+en.css
15 ms
default.css
45 ms
default+en.I.js
46 ms
RickLittle.jpg
42 ms
-w-350.jpg
457 ms
-w-200.jpg
265 ms
default.css
63 ms
ad.php
170 ms
blueball.gif
160 ms
244047.1445538086.gif
282 ms
ad.php
198 ms
ad.php
178 ms
ad.php
174 ms
ad.php
200 ms
util.js
127 ms
async-ads.js
64 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
62 ms
arwL.png
47 ms
arwR.png
45 ms
small-logo.png
81 ms
search_box_icon.png
46 ms
clear.png
47 ms
nav_logo114.png
45 ms
156400.1401904713.gif
211 ms
ad.php
146 ms
234440.1451922166.jpg
275 ms
ad.php
147 ms
util.js
43 ms
buttons.css
43 ms
swfobject.js
12 ms
156423.1362509543.jpg
217 ms
ad.php
215 ms
buttons.css
27 ms
lightbox.css
32 ms
3924.2b09f66a638673b585212fd972681ed8.1432642595.gif
511 ms
ad.php
246 ms
lightbox.css
24 ms
lightbox.js
39 ms
lightbox.js
26 ms
overrides.js
29 ms
overrides.js
19 ms
window_ref.js
21 ms
window_ref.js
37 ms
translate_24dp.png
31 ms
l
39 ms
googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png
26 ms
siteselection.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
siteselection.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
siteselection.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Siteselection.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Siteselection.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
siteselection.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Site Selection. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: