Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

sitestacker.com

A Unified Platform for Non-Profit Digital Initiatives - WMTEK Official Provider of Site Stacker

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

13 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

sitestacker.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Site Stacker content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sitestacker.com

The official website of WMtek, creators of Site Stacker. We develop websites and web applications for ministries.

Visit sitestacker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sitestacker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sitestacker.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,600 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.162

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sitestacker.com

13 ms

sitestacker.com

623 ms

css-variables.css

46 ms

jquery.customAlert.css

46 ms

popup.css

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 122 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Sitestacker.com, 13% (16 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Sitestacker.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (22%)

Content Size

6.9 MB

After Optimization

5.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Sitestacker.com main page is 6.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 329.6 kB

  • Original 725.6 kB
  • After minification 683.3 kB
  • After compression 396.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 329.6 kB or 45% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 5.9 MB
  • After minification 4.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Site Stacker needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 26.8 kB

  • Original 195.6 kB
  • After minification 195.6 kB
  • After compression 168.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 26.8 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 25.0 kB

  • Original 126.0 kB
  • After minification 126.0 kB
  • After compression 101.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitestacker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 76 (68%)

Requests Now

111

After Optimization

35

The browser has sent 111 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Site Stacker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 63 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sitestacker.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sitestacker.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sitestacker.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitestacker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sitestacker.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Site Stacker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: