4.1 sec in total
761 ms
3 sec
328 ms
Visit sitesteering.com now to see the best up-to-date Sitesteering content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sitesteering.com
Visit sitesteering.comWe analyzed Sitesteering.com page load time and found that the first response time was 761 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
sitesteering.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value16.6 s
0/100
10%
Value2,820 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.058
98/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
761 ms
19 ms
137 ms
95 ms
91 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Sitesteering.com, 14% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (874 ms) belongs to the original domain Sitesteering.com.
Page size can be reduced by 625.4 kB (51%)
1.2 MB
607.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Sitesteering.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 431.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sitesteering images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 222.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 222.9 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 364.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitesteering.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 364.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (57%)
42
18
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sitesteering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sitesteering.com
761 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
137 ms
jquery.cookiebar.css
95 ms
appdesign.css
91 ms
custompopup.css
93 ms
style.min.css
185 ms
default.min.css
818 ms
s2member-o.php
676 ms
jquery.js
445 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
192 ms
op-jquery-base-all.min.js
382 ms
css
23 ms
collect
12 ms
css
17 ms
jquery.min.js
64 ms
bootstrap-formhelpers-phone.js
228 ms
validation.min.js
238 ms
comment-reply.min.js
330 ms
s2member-o.php
874 ms
wp-embed.min.js
420 ms
op-front-all.min.js
684 ms
menus.min.js
486 ms
frontcustum.js
522 ms
jquery.jqDock.min.js
623 ms
fisheye-iutil.min.js
714 ms
jquery.reveal.js
726 ms
site_steering_header_logo_350x106.png
260 ms
Untitled-11.png
399 ms
sms_text_message_marketing_image_200.png
300 ms
117.png
408 ms
109.png
399 ms
20.png
299 ms
0.png
389 ms
quote-tip.png
391 ms
Untitled-1134.png
468 ms
power_of_mobile_marketing_ebook_400.png
828 ms
user.png
475 ms
mail.png
476 ms
privacy.png
481 ms
frontbarloader.gif
540 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
188 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
189 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
190 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
189 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
190 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
189 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
190 ms
checkout.js
56 ms
ajax-loader.gif
305 ms
sitesteering.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sitesteering.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sitesteering.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitesteering.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Sitesteering.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sitesteering.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sitesteering. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: