5.3 sec in total
751 ms
4.4 sec
157 ms
Welcome to siteworth.xyz homepage info - get ready to check Siteworth best content right away, or after learning these important things about siteworth.xyz
Get complete Website Worth Stats, Traffic Stats, Search Engines Index Stats, Website Safety Stats, SEO Stats, Social Media Stats, Domain Info & Web Server I
Visit siteworth.xyzWe analyzed Siteworth.xyz page load time and found that the first response time was 751 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
siteworth.xyz performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
72/100
10%
Value3.0 s
79/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value3.2 s
94/100
10%
751 ms
159 ms
132 ms
143 ms
6 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Siteworth.xyz, 36% (20 requests) were made to Google.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 320.8 kB (60%)
532.9 kB
212.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Siteworth.xyz main page is 532.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 246.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Siteworth images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 120.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 120.4 kB or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 151.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Siteworth.xyz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 151.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (76%)
45
11
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Siteworth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
siteworth.xyz
751 ms
bootstrap.min.css
159 ms
font-awesome.min.css
132 ms
style.css
143 ms
adsbygoogle.js
6 ms
echo.min.js
188 ms
jquery.1.9.1.min.js
259 ms
bootstrap.min.js
204 ms
jquery-cookie.js
206 ms
ajaxQ.js
248 ms
javascript.php
370 ms
css
28 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
sdk.js
33 ms
favicons
406 ms
favicons
569 ms
favicons
213 ms
favicons
292 ms
favicons
802 ms
favicons
172 ms
favicons
484 ms
favicons
557 ms
favicons
1449 ms
favicons
615 ms
favicons
1799 ms
favicons
593 ms
favicons
3460 ms
favicons
933 ms
favicons
655 ms
favicons
689 ms
favicons
987 ms
favicons
2120 ms
favicons
1064 ms
favicons
2552 ms
background.jpg
267 ms
logo.png
125 ms
captcha.php
392 ms
large_logo.png
166 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
17 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
58 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
59 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
59 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
59 ms
ca-pub-5554717526725851.js
79 ms
zrt_lookup.html
78 ms
show_ads_impl.js
82 ms
collect
63 ms
185 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
208 ms
xd_arbiter.php
50 ms
xd_arbiter.php
62 ms
ads
38 ms
osd.js
19 ms
ads
41 ms
ads
27 ms
siteworth.xyz accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
siteworth.xyz best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
siteworth.xyz SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Siteworth.xyz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Siteworth.xyz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
siteworth.xyz
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Siteworth. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: