Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

skild.com

Skild | Experts in Innovation Challenges & Learning Programs

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

143 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

3.3 sec

skild.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Skild content for Rwanda. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about skild.com

From the creators of Innovation Challenge® - Everything you need to run your Innovation Challenge® - access a network of 10,000 innovation scouts, an easy-to-use software platform, guidance and white ...

Visit skild.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Skild.com page load time and found that the first response time was 143 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

skild.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

skild.com

143 ms

www.skild.com

140 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

175 ms

jquery-migrate-3.3.0.min.js

253 ms

layout.min.css

114 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Skild.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to No-cache.hubspot.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (741 ms) relates to the external source Js.hs-analytics.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 116.3 kB (43%)

Content Size

270.0 kB

After Optimization

153.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Skild.com main page is 270.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 121.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 100.1 kB

  • Original 121.0 kB
  • After minification 109.6 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 73.0 kB
  • After minification 70.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Skild images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 36 B

  • Original 35.9 kB
  • After minification 35.9 kB
  • After compression 35.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

  • Original 40.0 kB
  • After minification 40.0 kB
  • After compression 27.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Skild.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (40%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

25

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Skild. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

skild.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

skild.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

skild.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Skild.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Skild.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Skild. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: