12.4 sec in total
2.5 sec
7.9 sec
2.1 sec
Welcome to slidingotter.com homepage info - get ready to check Sliding Otter best content right away, or after learning these important things about slidingotter.com
Featuring the Writings of Joseph Langen
Visit slidingotter.comWe analyzed Slidingotter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 10 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
slidingotter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
6/100
10%
Value5.7 s
17/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.9 s
66/100
10%
2454 ms
130 ms
279 ms
194 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Slidingotter.com, 11% (4 requests) were made to I1.wp.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) relates to the external source I1.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 333.9 kB (42%)
795.7 kB
461.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Slidingotter.com main page is 795.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 342.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 710 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sliding Otter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 120.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 120.8 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 164.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slidingotter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 164.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (63%)
35
13
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sliding Otter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.slidingotter.com
2454 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
130 ms
frontend-render.css
279 ms
style.css
194 ms
css
25 ms
form-themes.min.css
228 ms
jetpack.css
186 ms
jquery.js
290 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
211 ms
inboundAnalytics.min.js
274 ms
photon.js
246 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
6 ms
gprofiles.js
63 ms
wpgroho.js
246 ms
navigation.js
431 ms
sss.min.js
432 ms
wp-embed.min.js
432 ms
e-201611.js
23 ms
dcd859b8-9aca-4b90-a30c-e36934722103.jpg
2257 ms
phone_WEB.jpg
650 ms
9c82e21d-7f11-4e5b-97a7-5cf4d42f828b.jpg
2374 ms
walking-926674_960_720-635x485.jpg
620 ms
GLFUMCCQXI.jpg
3000 ms
0GI8T5SLX7.jpg
2311 ms
goodreads.png
115 ms
twitter.png
111 ms
facebook.png
113 ms
google.png
109 ms
pinterest.png
111 ms
linkedin.png
108 ms
SAM_2722.jpg
1455 ms
SAM_2827.jpg
1254 ms
n-HELPING-HAND-628x314.jpg
109 ms
hovercard.css
29 ms
services.css
54 ms
g.gif
9 ms
slidingotter.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
slidingotter.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
slidingotter.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slidingotter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Slidingotter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
slidingotter.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sliding Otter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: