Tools & Wizards About Us
slimteam.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

slimteam.com

slimteam.com

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

156 ms

slimteam.com screenshot

About Website

Visit slimteam.com now to see the best up-to-date Slimteam content for Thailand and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about slimteam.com

Visit slimteam.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Slimteam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

slimteam.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

slimteam.com

1357 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

507 ms

edd.min.css

513 ms

css

29 ms

genericons.css

776 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Slimteam.com, 65% (11 requests) were made to Woocommerce-4315-37045-94154.cloudwaysapps.com and 24% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Slimteam.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 230.1 kB (73%)

Content Size

313.8 kB

After Optimization

83.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Slimteam.com main page is 313.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 152.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 8.5 kB

  • Original 12.4 kB
  • After minification 11.9 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.5 kB or 68% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 103.7 kB

  • Original 152.4 kB
  • After minification 150.5 kB
  • After compression 48.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 103.7 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 117.9 kB

  • Original 149.0 kB
  • After minification 122.5 kB
  • After compression 31.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slimteam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 117.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (83%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slimteam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

slimteam.com

slimteam.com

1357 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

507 ms

edd.min.css

edd.min.css

513 ms

css

css

29 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

776 ms

style.css

style.css

768 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

779 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

542 ms

edd-ajax.min.js

edd-ajax.min.js

755 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

758 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

807 ms

functions.js

functions.js

1002 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1005 ms

fVu1p3782bqS2z-CaJvp9i3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

fVu1p3782bqS2z-CaJvp9i3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

38 ms

lJAvZoKA5NttpPc9yc6lPbOLyRJkM5aLlPlkJMOAyH0.ttf

lJAvZoKA5NttpPc9yc6lPbOLyRJkM5aLlPlkJMOAyH0.ttf

54 ms

PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ19qQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ19qQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

70 ms

erE3KsIWUumgD1j_Ca-V-6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

erE3KsIWUumgD1j_Ca-V-6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

82 ms

SEO Factors

slimteam.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slimteam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Chinese language. Our system also found out that Slimteam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

slimteam.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Slimteam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: