Tools & Wizards About Us
smorgasbord.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

smorgasbord.net

Tech Reviews and Geek Blog + Ubuntu Help = The Smorgasbord

Page Load Speed

7.6 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

2.2 sec

smorgasbord.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Smorgasbord content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about smorgasbord.net

Gadget Reviews, Tech Reviews, Ubuntu Help, Distractions and Funny Internet Stuff: The Smorgasbord Geek Blog!

Visit smorgasbord.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Smorgasbord.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

smorgasbord.net performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.069

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.smorgasbord.net

1471 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

138 ms

twentyfourteen.css

148 ms

css

65 ms

genericons.css

235 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Smorgasbord.net, 17% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Smorgasbord.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 856.6 kB (62%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

523.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Smorgasbord.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 516.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 64.2 kB

  • Original 85.5 kB
  • After minification 83.3 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 222.2 kB

  • Original 516.3 kB
  • After minification 294.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Smorgasbord needs image optimization as it can save up to 222.2 kB or 43% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 226.1 kB

  • Original 352.3 kB
  • After minification 350.1 kB
  • After compression 126.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 226.1 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 344.1 kB

  • Original 426.0 kB
  • After minification 404.0 kB
  • After compression 81.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Smorgasbord.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 344.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (44%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smorgasbord. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.smorgasbord.net

www.smorgasbord.net

1471 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

138 ms

twentyfourteen.css

twentyfourteen.css

148 ms

css

css

65 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

235 ms

style.css

style.css

227 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

215 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

318 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

239 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

10 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

56 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

78 ms

functions.js

functions.js

88 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

89 ms

e-201611.js

e-201611.js

9 ms

ir

ir

125 ms

pattern-light.svg

pattern-light.svg

731 ms

spherical_tires-672x372.jpg

spherical_tires-672x372.jpg

723 ms

floating_shelves.jpg

floating_shelves.jpg

735 ms

black_floating_shelves.jpg

black_floating_shelves.jpg

732 ms

floating_wall_mounted_shelf.jpg

floating_wall_mounted_shelf.jpg

733 ms

gopro_alternative.jpg

gopro_alternative.jpg

733 ms

gopro_accessories_kit.jpg

gopro_accessories_kit.jpg

1014 ms

cheetah_flat_screen_tv_mount.jpg

cheetah_flat_screen_tv_mount.jpg

1013 ms

90_degree_HDMI_adapters.jpg

90_degree_HDMI_adapters.jpg

1013 ms

cable_shield_tv_cord_cover.jpg

cable_shield_tv_cord_cover.jpg

1016 ms

how_to_install_KODI.jpg

how_to_install_KODI.jpg

1013 ms

kodi_box_android_5.1.jpg

kodi_box_android_5.1.jpg

1012 ms

kodi_box_octacore.jpg

kodi_box_octacore.jpg

1042 ms

cheap-lightning-charger.jpg

cheap-lightning-charger.jpg

1041 ms

ubuntu-boot-live-cd-virtual-box.png

ubuntu-boot-live-cd-virtual-box.png

1205 ms

oSFYwDDVgac

oSFYwDDVgac

635 ms

zk3i4R3mtCY

zk3i4R3mtCY

695 ms

I2VAoLGeqro

I2VAoLGeqro

767 ms

4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf

4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf

647 ms

BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf

BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf

665 ms

zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf

zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf

738 ms

5pEc4QKTMA2oB4Hi9NkS4w.ttf

5pEc4QKTMA2oB4Hi9NkS4w.ttf

738 ms

Genericons.svg

Genericons.svg

1042 ms

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

4 ms

LgcV55siz7BRNdbO3Huj5g.ttf

LgcV55siz7BRNdbO3Huj5g.ttf

735 ms

XNVd6tsqi9wmKNvnh5HNEKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

XNVd6tsqi9wmKNvnh5HNEKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

736 ms

AcvTq8Q0lyKKNxRlL28Rn6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

AcvTq8Q0lyKKNxRlL28Rn6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

735 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

52 ms

services.css

services.css

71 ms

g.gif

g.gif

15 ms

www-embed-player-vfl8xM8me.css

www-embed-player-vfl8xM8me.css

118 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

145 ms

Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js

Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js

131 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

133 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

18 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

11 ms

Accessibility Review

smorgasbord.net accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

smorgasbord.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

smorgasbord.net SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smorgasbord.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Smorgasbord.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

smorgasbord.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Smorgasbord. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: