Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

snapfiles.net

porkbun.com | parked domain

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

190 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

223 ms

snapfiles.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Snapfiles content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about snapfiles.net

Download freeware and shareware programs, fully reviewed and rated by SnapFiles staff, and user reviews. Established in 1997

Visit snapfiles.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Snapfiles.net page load time and found that the first response time was 190 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

snapfiles.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

snapfiles.net

190 ms

reset.css

121 ms

cs3.css

122 ms

snapfiles10-5.css

167 ms

css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Snapfiles.net, 17% (19 requests) were made to Snapfiles.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (441 ms) belongs to the original domain Snapfiles.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 260.8 kB (42%)

Content Size

624.4 kB

After Optimization

363.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Snapfiles.net main page is 624.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 261.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 34.2 kB

  • Original 42.2 kB
  • After minification 41.7 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 261.8 kB
  • After minification 256.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snapfiles images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 114.8 kB

  • Original 190.2 kB
  • After minification 185.7 kB
  • After compression 75.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 114.8 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 106.6 kB

  • Original 130.1 kB
  • After minification 121.0 kB
  • After compression 23.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snapfiles.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 106.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (53%)

Requests Now

102

After Optimization

48

The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snapfiles. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

snapfiles.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snapfiles.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Snapfiles.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Snapfiles. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: