5.2 sec in total
786 ms
2.8 sec
1.7 sec
Click here to check amazing Sonar Con content for Peru. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sonar-con.net
sonar-con.net is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, sonar-con.net has it all. We hope you find...
Visit sonar-con.netWe analyzed Sonar-con.net page load time and found that the first response time was 786 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
sonar-con.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.3 s
1/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value25.6 s
0/100
10%
Value47,100 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value63.5 s
0/100
10%
786 ms
108 ms
173 ms
194 ms
170 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Sonar-con.net, 9% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (786 ms) belongs to the original domain Sonar-con.net.
Page size can be reduced by 334.6 kB (54%)
617.7 kB
283.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Sonar-con.net main page is 617.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 245.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sonar Con images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 89.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 44% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 204.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sonar-con.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 204.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (75%)
32
8
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sonar Con. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sonar-con.net
786 ms
adsbygoogle.js
108 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
173 ms
style.min.css
194 ms
kk-star-ratings.css
170 ms
screen.min.css
170 ms
bootstrap.min.css
252 ms
fontawesome-all.min.css
197 ms
css
51 ms
style.css
334 ms
addthis_wordpress_public.min.css
282 ms
jquery.js
360 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
300 ms
bootstrap.min.js
359 ms
functions.js
426 ms
analytics.js
522 ms
brand
130 ms
kk-star-ratings.js
461 ms
front.min.js
486 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.min.js
492 ms
jquery.sonar.min.js
483 ms
lazy-load.js
507 ms
addthis_widget.js
126 ms
wp-embed.min.js
708 ms
brandjs.js
44 ms
collect
355 ms
1x1.trans.gif
349 ms
branding.png
337 ms
moatframe.js
124 ms
featured.png
241 ms
_ate.track.config_resp
256 ms
300lo.json
239 ms
client.es.min.json
56 ms
sh.f48a1a04fe8dbf021b4cda1d.html
74 ms
sonar-con.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
sonar-con.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sonar-con.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sonar-con.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Spanish language. Our system also found out that Sonar-con.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sonar-con.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sonar Con. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: