Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

sonartour.com

tatil - Sonar Tour

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

96 ms

sonartour.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sonartour.com homepage info - get ready to check Sonar Tour best content right away, or after learning these important things about sonartour.com

Sonar turizm seyahat acentası

Visit sonartour.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sonartour.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Sonartour.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

sonartour.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.277

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sonartour.com

2039 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Sonartour.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Sonartour.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 813 B (85%)

Content Size

962 B

After Optimization

149 B

In fact, the total size of Sonartour.com main page is 962 B. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 962 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 813 B

  • Original 962 B
  • After minification 205 B
  • After compression 149 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 757 B, which is 79% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 813 B or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

sonartour.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sonartour.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sonartour.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    TR

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sonartour.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sonartour.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sonar Tour. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: