929 ms in total
146 ms
571 ms
212 ms
Visit spacesocket.com now to see the best up-to-date Spacesocket content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about spacesocket.com
Get fast and reliable web hosting in exchange for contributing just a few minutes each month to the Space Socket community.
Visit spacesocket.comWe analyzed Spacesocket.com page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 783 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
spacesocket.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value4.1 s
47/100
25%
Value6.3 s
41/100
10%
Value2,960 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value20.1 s
2/100
10%
146 ms
150 ms
31 ms
81 ms
9 ms
Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Spacesocket.com, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Scripts.chitika.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (152 ms) belongs to the original domain Spacesocket.com.
Page size can be reduced by 61.3 kB (55%)
111.3 kB
50.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Spacesocket.com main page is 111.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 88.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Spacesocket needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 52.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 52.9 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spacesocket.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
16
16
The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spacesocket. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
spacesocket.com
146 ms
www.spacesocket.com
150 ms
header.css
31 ms
site.css
81 ms
amm.js
9 ms
logo-small.png
53 ms
lua.gif
147 ms
php.gif
150 ms
perl.png
148 ms
python.gif
150 ms
rails.gif
147 ms
mysql.png
147 ms
postgresql.gif
150 ms
sqlite.gif
152 ms
ga.js
8 ms
img01.jpg
71 ms
__utm.gif
18 ms
quant.js
11 ms
spacesocket.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
spacesocket.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
spacesocket.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spacesocket.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Spacesocket.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
spacesocket.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Spacesocket. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: