20 sec in total
1.4 sec
18.1 sec
527 ms
Visit spfc.co.in now to see the best up-to-date SPFC content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about spfc.co.in
SPFC Finance is a Thane based RBI registered NBFC, engaged in Two-Wheeler Financing who provide best financial services to the one who desires to fulfill their own dreams.
Visit spfc.co.inWe analyzed Spfc.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 18.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
spfc.co.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.2 s
0/100
10%
Value18.9 s
0/100
25%
Value25.1 s
0/100
10%
Value2,020 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.444
21/100
15%
Value19.3 s
2/100
10%
1375 ms
31 ms
62 ms
133 ms
173 ms
Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (96 requests) were addressed to the original Spfc.co.in, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Spfc.co.in.
Page size can be reduced by 131.2 kB (6%)
2.2 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Spfc.co.in main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.3 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SPFC images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spfc.co.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (64%)
98
35
The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SPFC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 59 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.spfc.co.in
1375 ms
css
31 ms
js
62 ms
dwq93.css
133 ms
dwq93.js
173 ms
dwq93.js
92 ms
dwq93.css
71 ms
js
74 ms
libs_new.min.js
10363 ms
scripts.js
10313 ms
wpcf7-redirect-script.js
10313 ms
api.js
63 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
104 ms
jquery.min.js
231 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
206 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
231 ms
easing.min.js
231 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
232 ms
superfish.min.js
232 ms
wow.min.js
233 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
273 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
273 ms
sticky.js
273 ms
main.js
274 ms
easyResponsiveTabs.js
274 ms
select2.full.min.js
283 ms
underscore.min.js
297 ms
wp-util.min.js
294 ms
um-crop.min.js
304 ms
um-modal.min.js
329 ms
um-jquery-form.min.js
327 ms
um-fileupload.min.js
10440 ms
picker.js
361 ms
picker.date.js
417 ms
picker.time.js
394 ms
legacy.js
424 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
450 ms
i18n.min.js
454 ms
um-raty.min.js
480 ms
um-tipsy.min.js
483 ms
modernizr.min.js
55 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
486 ms
js
149 ms
analytics.js
18 ms
masonry.min.js
448 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
482 ms
collect
12 ms
simplebar.min.js
447 ms
um-functions.min.js
435 ms
um-responsive.min.js
378 ms
font
68 ms
um-conditional.min.js
408 ms
um-scripts.min.js
384 ms
um-profile.min.js
414 ms
um-account.min.js
414 ms
wp-embed.min.js
443 ms
main.js
445 ms
core.min.js
433 ms
widget.min.js
10090 ms
mouse.min.js
463 ms
slider.min.js
492 ms
chart-loader.js
527 ms
bootstrap.min.js
561 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
577 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
627 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
699 ms
loader.gif
729 ms
header-bg.png
738 ms
pay-emi-menu.png
768 ms
login-menu.png
767 ms
two-wheeler-menu.png
765 ms
emi-menu.png
773 ms
customer-service-menu.png
797 ms
branch-locator-menu.png
802 ms
feedback-complaint-menu.png
828 ms
apply-now-menu.png
833 ms
home-header1-1.jpg
889 ms
home-header2.jpg
896 ms
home-header3-1.jpg
936 ms
home-header4.jpg
1019 ms
about-image.jpg
1177 ms
why-choose-bg.png
1182 ms
select-down-arrow.png
1212 ms
testimonial-bg.jpg
1238 ms
recaptcha__en.js
59 ms
search-icon.png
83 ms
telephone-icon.png
84 ms
logo.png
105 ms
call-now-btn.png
82 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
68 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
33 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
64 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
34 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
55 ms
dwq93.css
78 ms
home-header-caption2.png
58 ms
home-header-caption4.png
57 ms
home-header-caption1.png
55 ms
features-icon.png
32 ms
eligibility-icon.png
31 ms
documentations-icon.png
33 ms
rates-fee-icon.png
60 ms
faq-icon-2.png
62 ms
apply-now-icon.png
61 ms
dwq93.css
35 ms
dwq93.css
34 ms
spfc.co.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
spfc.co.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
spfc.co.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spfc.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spfc.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
spfc.co.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SPFC. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: