6.6 sec in total
1.5 sec
4.8 sec
308 ms
Click here to check amazing Sportinggoodsreviews content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sportinggoodsreviews.net
Visit sportinggoodsreviews.netWe analyzed Sportinggoodsreviews.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
sportinggoodsreviews.net performance score
1493 ms
620 ms
527 ms
25 ms
527 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Sportinggoodsreviews.net, 8% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Sportinggoodsreviews.net.
Page size can be reduced by 326.0 kB (58%)
565.1 kB
239.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Sportinggoodsreviews.net main page is 565.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 199.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sportinggoodsreviews images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 125.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.6 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 166.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sportinggoodsreviews.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 166.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (51%)
35
17
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sportinggoodsreviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sportinggoodsreviews.net
1493 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
620 ms
widget.css
527 ms
css
25 ms
athemes-symbols.css
527 ms
bootstrap.min.css
793 ms
style.css
615 ms
jetpack.css
705 ms
jquery.js
898 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
654 ms
bootstrap.min.js
830 ms
hoverIntent.js
740 ms
superfish.js
1004 ms
settings.js
1004 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
3 ms
gprofiles.js
53 ms
wpgroho.js
896 ms
wp-embed.min.js
898 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
Wilson-Golf-Bags-640x250.jpg
241 ms
Titleist-Golf-Bags-400x250.jpg
209 ms
New-Balance-Golf-Shoes-440x250.jpg
236 ms
Team-Golf-Golf-Bags-300x250.jpg
210 ms
Golf-GPS-Rangefinders-500x250.gif
325 ms
Wilson-Golf-Bags-50x50.jpg
205 ms
golfball-50x50.jpg
285 ms
swing-instead-of-hit.WidePlayer-50x50.jpg
311 ms
pDSP1-13339037p275w-50x50.jpg
309 ms
Callaway-Golf-C-Tech-Saddle-Jr-Golf-Shoes_Default_550-50x50.jpeg
408 ms
Titleist-Golf-Bags-50x50.jpg
406 ms
New-Balance-Golf-Shoes-50x50.jpg
448 ms
Team-Golf-Golf-Bags-50x50.jpg
443 ms
Golf-GPS-Rangefinders-50x50.gif
466 ms
lXoKq2PC8Z_S1wl-BwvrB-vvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
143 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
143 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
144 ms
afonts.woff
421 ms
hovercard.css
27 ms
services.css
52 ms
g.gif
17 ms
sportinggoodsreviews.net SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sportinggoodsreviews.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sportinggoodsreviews.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sportinggoodsreviews.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sportinggoodsreviews. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: