2.6 sec in total
72 ms
2.4 sec
131 ms
Visit spratings.com now to see the best up-to-date Sp Ratings content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about spratings.com
We provide intelligence that is embedded into the workflow and decision-making of customers around the globe.
Visit spratings.comWe analyzed Spratings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 72 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
spratings.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value19.4 s
0/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value1,430 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.259
48/100
15%
Value20.0 s
2/100
10%
72 ms
869 ms
31 ms
635 ms
76 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Spratings.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (869 ms) belongs to the original domain Spratings.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (75%)
1.9 MB
470.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Spratings.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sp Ratings needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 45% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 872.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 872.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 516.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spratings.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 516.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (73%)
55
15
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sp Ratings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
spratings.com
72 ms
www.spratings.com
869 ms
home
31 ms
home
635 ms
aui.css
76 ms
main.css
66 ms
main.css
63 ms
main.css
46 ms
main.css
106 ms
main.css
104 ms
barebone.jsp
200 ms
main.js
104 ms
navigation.js
103 ms
main.css
104 ms
font-awesome.min.css
121 ms
sp-core.min.css
137 ms
promo-page.css
134 ms
jquery-1.8.0.min.js
164 ms
masonary.min.js
152 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
159 ms
bootstrap.min.js
163 ms
gallery-y-common-infinite-scroll.js
164 ms
embed.js
102 ms
spratings.min.js
177 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
334 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
333 ms
jquery.treeview.min.js
332 ms
moment.js
337 ms
custom.min.js
337 ms
bjqs-1.3.min.js
350 ms
satelliteLib-9dcc14e7923bea5a0eeae48ecab47631427b0bbc.js
335 ms
main.js
346 ms
main.css
140 ms
embed.js
36 ms
incomp-msg.jpg
50 ms
sp-logo.png
51 ms
search-icon.png
48 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
45 ms
satellite-5549a5676333300017a90500.html
73 ms
satellite-5549a5676333300017aa0500.html
63 ms
analytics.js
21 ms
fontawesome-alloy.woff
44 ms
redLock.png
43 ms
fav-icon.png
41 ms
29 ms
collect
50 ms
45 ms
pixel
68 ms
loader.gif
30 ms
s-code-contents-3837bef7d31d22179e1d380b31ce9050e783ed3c.js
63 ms
22 ms
pixel
10 ms
20 ms
available_languages.jsp
30 ms
21 ms
s58539697146043
12 ms
26 ms
57 ms
53 ms
44 ms
spratings.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
ARIA IDs are not unique
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
spratings.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
spratings.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spratings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spratings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
spratings.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sp Ratings. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: