1.5 sec in total
44 ms
848 ms
651 ms
Visit springerprotocols.com now to see the best up-to-date Springer Protocols content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about springerprotocols.com
Search and evaluate Springer Nature protocols and methods here
Visit springerprotocols.comWe analyzed Springerprotocols.com page load time and found that the first response time was 44 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
springerprotocols.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value13.3 s
0/100
10%
Value18.0 s
0/100
25%
Value28.9 s
0/100
10%
Value640 ms
46/100
30%
Value0.08
94/100
15%
Value22.8 s
1/100
10%
44 ms
50 ms
177 ms
175 ms
220 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Springerprotocols.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ad.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (220 ms) belongs to the original domain Springerprotocols.com.
Page size can be reduced by 76.1 kB (55%)
137.5 kB
61.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Springerprotocols.com main page is 137.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 56.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.7 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Springer Protocols needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 19.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.3 kB or 34% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Springerprotocols.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.3 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (55%)
42
19
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Springer Protocols. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
springerprotocols.com
44 ms
www.springerprotocols.com
50 ms
layout.css
177 ms
body_fixed.css
175 ms
body.css
220 ms
search.js
217 ms
common.js
177 ms
;sz=160x600;tile=1;ord=6275824483018368
172 ms
header_left.jpg
118 ms
header_bg.jpg
131 ms
header_logo.gif
130 ms
about_Icon.gif
129 ms
rss.gif
129 ms
help_Icon.gif
128 ms
springer_logo.gif
128 ms
header_right.jpg
145 ms
bot_left.jpg
144 ms
bot_right.jpg
143 ms
top_left.jpg
142 ms
iPhone%20_3.png
162 ms
topright.jpg
160 ms
1topleft.jpg
159 ms
1topright.jpg
169 ms
botright.jpg
166 ms
1botright.jpg
165 ms
upload_protocol.gif
165 ms
palert.gif
177 ms
video_protocol.gif
177 ms
comment.gif
175 ms
fav1.gif
174 ms
rss_icon.gif
174 ms
bl_title.gif
172 ms
divider2.gif
178 ms
new_porotcol.gif
176 ms
free_protocol.gif
162 ms
popular_protocol.gif
161 ms
tour.gif
161 ms
cont_editor.gif
160 ms
lib_admin.gif
160 ms
arrow.gif
184 ms
btnBg.gif
24 ms
ga.js
30 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
chartbeat.js
31 ms
springerprotocols.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
springerprotocols.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
springerprotocols.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Springerprotocols.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Springerprotocols.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
springerprotocols.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Springer Protocols. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: