3.8 sec in total
582 ms
1.1 sec
2.1 sec
Welcome to spur.com homepage info - get ready to check Spur best content right away, or after learning these important things about spur.com
by Vishal Joshi
Visit spur.comWe analyzed Spur.com page load time and found that the first response time was 582 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
spur.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value750 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value8.7 s
36/100
10%
582 ms
15 ms
22 ms
24 ms
14 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Spur.com, 17% (13 requests) were made to Lh3.ggpht.com and 17% (13 requests) were made to Lh5.ggpht.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (582 ms) belongs to the original domain Spur.com.
Page size can be reduced by 780.7 kB (19%)
4.1 MB
3.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Spur.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 193.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 193.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 207.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Spur images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 355.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 355.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spur.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (16%)
73
61
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spur. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
spur.com
582 ms
pre_tumblelog.js
15 ms
font-awesome.min.css
22 ms
main2.0.min.css
24 ms
tumblelog_post_message_queue.js
14 ms
stylesheet.css
19 ms
jquery.min.js
142 ms
photosetgrid1.0.1.js
139 ms
app.min.js
139 ms
index.js
138 ms
StartupAzureportal%25255B3%25255D.png
269 ms
like_iframe.html
262 ms
BuildingAzurePortal%25255B3%25255D.png
261 ms
AzureFridayOverview%25255B10%25255D.png
247 ms
clip_image0024_thumb.jpg
233 ms
CloudCover%25255B3%25255D.png
209 ms
ManagingMoney%25255B3%25255D.png
211 ms
C9Live%25255B6%25255D.png
217 ms
clip_image0044_thumb.jpg
189 ms
clip_image0214_thumb.png
188 ms
clip_image041_thumb.jpg
188 ms
clip_image0484_thumb.jpg
202 ms
clip_image0504_thumb.jpg
204 ms
clip_image0604_thumb.jpg
204 ms
clip_image0664_thumb.jpg
208 ms
image_thumb%25255B1%25255D.png
214 ms
clip_image0084_thumb.jpg
187 ms
clip_image0124_thumb.jpg
186 ms
clip_image0154_thumb.png
185 ms
clip_image019_thumb.jpg
200 ms
clip_image0224_thumb.png
205 ms
clip_image024_thumb.png
184 ms
clip_image0354_thumb.jpg
199 ms
clip_image0464_thumb.jpg
199 ms
clip_image0524_thumb.jpg
199 ms
clip_image0544_thumb.jpg
202 ms
clip_image0624_thumb.jpg
210 ms
clip_image070_thumb.jpg
202 ms
clip_image0064_thumb.png
197 ms
clip_image0104_thumb.jpg
194 ms
clip_image0204_thumb.png
193 ms
clip_image0234_thumb.png
196 ms
clip_image0334_thumb.jpg
194 ms
clip_image042_thumb.png
192 ms
clip_image0444_thumb.jpg
199 ms
clip_image0585_thumb.jpg
198 ms
clip_image0644_thumb.jpg
198 ms
clip_image0684_thumb.jpg
199 ms
tumblr_static_1wutjpdmomxw0w4wkso4s000k_2048_v2.jpg
204 ms
Trailer%25255B7%25255D.png
199 ms
clip_image0054_thumb.png
190 ms
clip_image0144_thumb.jpg
192 ms
clip_image0174_thumb.jpg
189 ms
clip_image025_thumb.png
188 ms
clip_image0274_thumb.jpg
189 ms
clip_image0294_thumb.jpg
193 ms
clip_image0314_thumb.jpg
192 ms
clip_image0374_thumb.jpg
191 ms
clip_image0394_thumb.jpg
191 ms
clip_image0565_thumb.jpg
194 ms
image%25255B4%25255D.png
194 ms
analytics.js
151 ms
impixu
165 ms
impixu
87 ms
analytics.html
74 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
49 ms
login_check.html
42 ms
collect
27 ms
cedexis.radar.js
20 ms
rapid-3.36.js
28 ms
rapidworker-1.2.js
32 ms
ga.js
37 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
cs.js
90 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
spur.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
spur.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
spur.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spur.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Spur.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
spur.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Spur. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: