4.9 sec in total
566 ms
4 sec
358 ms
Click here to check amazing SRSFF content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about srsff.ro
Societatea Romana de Science Fiction si Fantasy
Visit srsff.roWe analyzed Srsff.ro page load time and found that the first response time was 566 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
srsff.ro performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value4.7 s
32/100
25%
Value8.0 s
22/100
10%
Value420 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.058
98/100
15%
Value8.7 s
36/100
10%
566 ms
210 ms
131 ms
129 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Srsff.ro, 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 13% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (890 ms) belongs to the original domain Srsff.ro.
Page size can be reduced by 908.7 kB (67%)
1.4 MB
448.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Srsff.ro main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 563.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SRSFF images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 341.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 341.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 481.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Srsff.ro needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 481.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (71%)
63
18
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SRSFF. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.srsff.ro
566 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
210 ms
styles.css
131 ms
pagenavi-css.css
129 ms
css
26 ms
css
49 ms
style.css
278 ms
style.css
152 ms
shortcodes.css
147 ms
form-themes.min.css
203 ms
popup-maker-site.min.css
206 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
217 ms
magnific_popup.css
216 ms
genericons.css
333 ms
jetpack.css
295 ms
avh-ec.widget.css
298 ms
jquery.js
498 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
403 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
369 ms
jquery.form.min.js
365 ms
scripts.js
373 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
11 ms
gprofiles.js
58 ms
wpgroho.js
373 ms
comment-reply.min.js
444 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
448 ms
custom.js
451 ms
core.min.js
525 ms
position.min.js
524 ms
popup-maker-site.min.js
566 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
531 ms
waypoints.min.js
539 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
565 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
614 ms
wp-embed.min.js
566 ms
forms-api.min.js
739 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
coperta-trim-1-2016.jpg
624 ms
logo-sw-style.png
415 ms
2016-B-CON-BANNER-EUROCON.jpg
523 ms
Eurocon-agents-poster.jpg
890 ms
Robodiseea.jpg
598 ms
IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf
16 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
17 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
42 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
40 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
43 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
43 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
41 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
40 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
43 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
44 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
376 ms
analytics.js
44 ms
collect
14 ms
likebox.php
435 ms
hovercard.css
87 ms
services.css
110 ms
g.gif
17 ms
hDvwL1_H7g-.css
180 ms
56WNbrUYLbL.css
221 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
305 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
378 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
301 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
298 ms
1476701_675992279164773_3004837138589809283_n.jpg
221 ms
11017682_732736726823661_1568823463869899732_n.png
263 ms
12688001_179252942443767_8178397812221302082_n.jpg
303 ms
148261_1529587657337957_1770606387782418650_n.jpg
497 ms
10534175_1107340682623246_5966725322383127845_n.jpg
385 ms
10292497_1059847670698982_1771810157741417391_n.jpg
338 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
51 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
50 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
49 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
41 ms
srsff.ro accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
srsff.ro best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
srsff.ro SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RO
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Srsff.ro can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Romanian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Srsff.ro main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
srsff.ro
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SRSFF. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: